The video_analysis tracks were moved from conductor/tracks/ to conductor/archive/analysis/ in commit 964d7edd. The .gitignore patterns need to point to the new location so the gitignored files (videos, transcripts, samples) continue to be excluded from tracking.
Updated:
- conductor/tracks/video_analysis_*/artifacts/*.mp4 -> conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_*/artifacts/*.mp4
- conductor/tracks/video_analysis_*/artifacts/*.vtt -> conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_*/artifacts/*.vtt
- conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_warmup_20260621/samples -> conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_deob_warmup_20260621/samples
Per the 3-step archiving convention:
1. Move the folders (done in 964d7edd)
2. Update tracks.md (this commit)
The 22 video_analysis tracks are now registered in the Archived section at the bottom of tracks.md. The Active Tracks table (rows 1-30) remains unchanged for the ongoing tracks (qwen_llama_grok, data_oriented_error_handling, mcp_architecture_refactor, etc.).
The 3-pass video analysis research campaign is officially CLOSED as of 2026-06-23. The campaign closeout report is at docs/reports/CAMPAIGN_CLOSE_OUT_video_analysis_20260621.md.
The 3-pass video analysis research campaign is CLOSED. All 25 tracks are archived at conductor/archive/analysis/.
22 video_analysis tracks moved:
- 1 Pass 1 umbrella (video_analysis_campaign_20260621)
- 12 Pass 1 video reports (cs229, probability_logic, entropy_epiplexity, score_dynamics, platonic, free_lunches, generic_systems, brain, neural_dynamics, multiscale, cs336, creikey)
- 1 Pass 1 synthesis (video_analysis_synthesis_20260621)
- 1 Pass 2 umbrella (video_analysis_deob_20260621)
- 4 Pass 2 sub-tracks (warmup, lexicon, pilot, apply)
- 3 sub-tracks (lexicon_v2, c11_reference, pass3)
The 3 sub-tracks of video_analysis_deob_*_20260623 are the v2 corrective patch, the C11 reference, and Pass 3.
All post-move paths:
- conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_campaign_20260621/
- conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_<slug>_20260621/ (x12)
- conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_synthesis_20260621/
- conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_deob_20260621/
- conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_deob_<warmup|lexicon|pilot|apply>_20260621/
- conductor/archive/analysis/video_analysis_deob_<lexicon_v2|c11_reference|pass3>_20260623/
2728 files renamed (mostly artifacts/frames/*.jpg from the Pass 1 video acquisitions).
Per user 2026-06-23: 'ok write a report to cohesively wrap up this campaign. Lets move all the video analaysis into archive/analysis.' The campaign is officially CLOSED.
All 11 tasks completed; all 14 verification flags true. The 3-pass research campaign ends here. The user's 'ok write a report to cohesively wrap up this campaign' is the formal approval; Pass 3 is SHIPPED.
Main C11 reference: 15 sections. ~700 LOC. Synthesizes the duffle/forth bootslop/Pikuma conventions with the raddbg fallback. Includes the per-language << / >> rendering for C11 (per the v2 lexicon). Hands off to Pass 3 as the primary C11 style guide. Sections: Overview, Naming conventions, Type system, Memory ordering, Inlining, Section placement, Macro style, Slice/arena, Comment style, Build flags, Error handling, Per-language rendering, raddbg fallback, Example program, Cross-references.
5 sections. ~80 LOC. PRIMARY (user's own project): 4 forth bootslop attempt_1 files (duffle.amd64.win32.h, main.c, microui.c, microui.h). Documents how the user applies duffle conventions in their own project; includes the microui library integration (MU_* prefix style).
3 sections. ~50 LOC. PRIMARY (forth references): 2 files (jombloforth.asm, jombloforth.f). Documents forth-specific style and the C-like idioms that translate to C11 (the user's own forth conventions inform the C11 style).
Both state.toml files updated to status = 'completed':
- video_analysis_deob_apply_20260621/state.toml: Pass 2 SHIPPED; 35 atomic commits; 14,413 LOC across 33 deliverables; 4 + 3 verification criteria met; 12 refinements + 8 gaps documented; user approved 2026-06-23 ('ok awesome')
- video_analysis_deob_lexicon_v2_20260623/state.toml: v2 corrective pass SHIPPED; 7 atomic commits; 17 v1->v2 changes applied; user approved 2026-06-23 ('ok awesome')
Pass 2 is COMPLETE. Pass 3 (C11/Python projection) is unblocked. The 6 open questions for Pass 3 are answered:
- Applied domain = C11 (raddbg/duffel/pikuma/forth bootslop) or Python (manual_slop)
- User-specific forms = annotation if not code; pseudo sectr lang needs adapting in code
- Indefinites use placeholder scheme (float/integer/Scalar); float64 only when target resolution matters
- Template notation B as default; C++/Odin/Jai opt-in; per-language << >> renderings documented
- Criteria are OK
- Pass 3 = markdown docs + code files (may or may not run)
Awaiting user's scoping decision for Pass 3.
3 principled maps reshaped per v2 corrections.
Map 1 (Curry-Howard): proof/construction distinction preserved; construction is a sub-type tag, not a replacement (per user 2026-06-23).
Map 2 (Types=Kinds, v2): Removed the 'Sets' leg (set is a data structure, not an enumerable type). Documented that 'kind' (lowercase) is reserved for enumeration types: components, DAG nodes, fat structs. Type/Genus/Kind are analogous (per user 2026-06-23).
Map 3 (Procedures=Words, v2): Removed the 'Functions' leg. function (declarative/math) and procedure (imperative/CS) are distinct concepts (per user 2026-06-23).
Maps 4, 5, 6 unchanged.
The pilot (Phase 2) is shipped; Phase 3 is now unblocked and ready for Tier 2 dispatch.
5 new files in video_analysis_deob_apply_20260621/:
- spec.md: updated to reference the new files (lightweight scaffold)
- plan.md: 6-phase pipeline (init → read → apply A cluster → apply B cluster → apply C cluster → apply E+D+synthesis → final report + verify) with 25 tasks
- metadata.json: scope, 14 verification criteria, 5-item risk register, 10 user directives
- state.toml: 6 phases + 25 tasks + 10 verification flags + 11 user-directives-logged entries
- TIER2_STARTER.md: dispatch prompt with file-read order, the 2 user refinements (decompress names + operator reference), the 3 pilot process improvements, the 8 refinements + 5 gaps to apply, the 11 inputs (10 videos + 1 synthesis), when-stuck guide, copy-paste-ready block
CRITICAL context for Tier 2 (the 2 user refinements + 3 pilot improvements):
1. **Decompress names AND expressions** (per 2026-06-23): use DESCRIPTIVE names, NOT single letters. Multi-line constructions preferred.
2. **Use the operator reference** (report.md §9): 13 categories of operators with behavior + type signatures. The LLM should consult this when applying the de-obfuscation.
3. **3-column translation tables** (pilot improvement #1)
4. **Tier-categorized decoders** (pilot improvement #2)
5. **Split apply_report.md** into 3 sections (pilot improvement #3)
The 11 inputs: 10 remaining Pass 1 reports + 1 cross-cutting synthesis. Produces 34 deliverables (33 per-video 3-layer files + 1 apply report). This is the FINAL phase of Pass 2 — the result feeds Pass 3 (projection to applied domain, future, user-led).
Per user 2026-06-23 feedback on the pilot output:
1. **Decompress names AND expressions** (in prompt_template.md 'Your role'):
- Name-bound terms should be DESCRIPTIVE, not single letters, unless the single letter is universally obvious (e.g., x for input, f for function)
- Examples: p(X₁, ..., X_L) → language_model(sequence : Token^L) -> Probability : float64
W · h + b → output_projection = weight_matrix.matmul(hidden_state) + bias_vector
H(X) → entropy(distribution : Probability_Distribution) -> Entropy : float64
K(X) → kolmogorov_complexity(object : Object) -> Complexity : int64
- The LLM should NOT be afraid to translate expressions to multi-line definitions or build them up as constructions
2. **§9 Operator reference (indexed)** in report.md (new section):
- 13 categories covering every operator the de-obfuscation uses in practice:
arithmetic, comparison, logical, set-theoretic, type-theoretic, constructors, data-oriented, pipeline, sectors, type-class resolution, process, procedural/functional, why-this-exists
- Each operator: symbol, name, behavior, type signature, example
- Comprehensive expansion of the warmup's §3.3 14-primitive grammar
- The LLM is expected to use this as a reference when applying the de-obfuscation
3. The 'while' operator is explicitly BANNED (per Rule 1) — use 'for', 'iterate', or 'Stream' instead.
These 2 refinements will be propagated forward:
- prompt_template.md 'Your role' updated (the LLM's direct operating stance)
- The §9 operator reference added to report.md (the warmup's design doc; the lexicon's source)
- Phase 3 (apply) TIER2_STARTER will reference both
All 5 phases marked completed; 12 verification flags all true; shipped_commit 8f64127f
User approved 2026-06-23.
Pilot produced 7 deliverables:
- 2 videos × 3 files (translation + deobfuscated + decoder) = 6 files, 1,566 LOC
- pilot_report.md (438 LOC) with 8 refinements + 5 gaps + 3 process improvements
- end-of-track report
All 4 verification criteria met for both videos (Lossless, Bounded, Constructively typed, Etymology-cited)
Plus the 3 additional criteria (Encoding-explicit, Form-anchored, User-specific conventions applied only when appropriate).
Phase 3 (apply) is now unblocked (consumes pilot_report.md refinements).
The lexicon child (Phase 1) is shipped; Phase 2 is now unblocked and ready for Tier 2 dispatch.
5 new files in video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621/:
- spec.md: updated to reference the new files (lightweight scaffold)
- plan.md: 5-phase pipeline (init → read → apply to cs229 → apply to entropy_epiplexity → refine + verify) with 20 tasks
- metadata.json: scope, 11 verification criteria, 5-item risk register, 9 user directives
- state.toml: 5 phases + 20 tasks + 12 verification flags + 9 user-directives-logged entries
- TIER2_STARTER.md: dispatch prompt with file-read order, the 5 rules + 4 verification criteria, the principled/user-specific distinction context, 2 pilot videos, when-stuck guide, copy-paste-ready block
CRITICAL context for Tier 2: the lexicon (Phase 1) honored the surgical edits:
- 16 [user-also-accepted] tags in lexicon.md
- 4 [principled] + 4 [user-preferred] tags in dedup_map.md
- §3.5 Sectored Language moved to Appendix B
- Esoteric content (Witness/Vessel/Aether) excluded per secular sanitization
Phase 2 must preserve this distinction. The LLM produces the principled re-encoding by default; user-specific form is opt-in. Esoteric content stays in cluster_0_twitter.md only.
The 2 pilot videos: cs229_building_llms (broad-and-shallow) + entropy_epiplexity (narrow-and-deep, tests boundedness on measure theory).
Scaffolds the Phase 1 (lexicon) child track with full Tier 2 dispatch support, matching the warmup's pattern.
- plan.md: 5-phase pipeline (init → read warmup → refine → codify → user review → verify) with 22 tasks
- metadata.json: scope, verification criteria, 6-item risk register, 9 user directives
- state.toml: 5 phases + 22 tasks + 12 verification flags + 10 user-directives-logged entries
- TIER2_STARTER.md: dispatch prompt with file-read order, 10 critical user directives, 6 key risks, hard constraints, sandbox conventions, 14 verification criteria, 5-phase execution plan, when-stuck guide, copy-paste-ready dispatch prompt
CRITICAL context for Tier 2: the warmup's 2026-06-23 surgical edits distinguished principled re-encodings (from the 5 rules) from user-specific re-encodings (Sectored Language, GA, classical Greek/Latin). Phase 1 FORMALIZES this distinction; it does NOT undo it.
- Tag each user-specific entry with [user-also-accepted]
- Move §3.5 (Sectored Language operator terms) to Appendix B
- DO NOT re-include esoteric content (Witness/Vessel/Aether) in the public lexicon
- DO NOT re-survey the samples; the cluster sub-reports are the evidence base
Per user 2026-06-23 review: the Tier 2 over-cited the user's specific implementations (Sectored Language V1, LLM session patterns, GA reinterpretations, classical Greek/Latin) as the canonical scheme, when they should be optional output conventions.
Changes:
1. report.md §3.4 — added Reading guide: Tier 4 mixes principled re-encodings (from the 5 rules) with user-specific re-encodings (from samples). The principled forms are scheme-canonical; the user-specific are optional output conventions.
2. report.md §3.5 — added Reading guide: Sectored Language operator terms are USER preferences, not scheme-canonical. The scheme produces principled re-encodings; the Sectored Language is one way to express them.
3. report.md §4.4 — added Reading guide: 'Real = Imaginary = Bivector' is the user's GA reinterpretation, not a scheme-canonical dedup. The principled forms are bivector (with grade annotation) + quantity(<value>) : <encoding>.
4. report.md §6.2 — added Reading guide: 4-layer output format is OPTIONAL (the user's preferred convention for etymological trails). The scheme's baseline is the 3-layer format.
5. prompt_template.md 'Your role' — removed 'Construct, not Invent' (was a user preference, not scheme-canonical). Added a 'Scheme-canonical vs. user-specific' bullet that makes the distinction explicit.
6. prompt_template.md 'The Sectored Language Operator Names' — labeled OPTIONAL; added Reading guide explaining it's one of several ways to express the scheme's principled re-encodings.
7. prompt_template.md verification checklist — replaced 'Sectored-language-named' with 'User-specific conventions applied only when appropriate'.
Phase 1 (lexicon child) will formalize this distinction further (e.g., moving §3.5 to Appendix B, marking each user-specific entry with [user-also-accepted]). The principled spine (5 rules + 6 noise-dedup maps + form-anchor examples + etymology rule + lossless preservation) is intact.
- tracks.md: new row 29 for the de-obfuscation campaign (priority A, research, awaits user samples)
- Pass 1 spec §11.1: superseded 2026-06-21; now points to the dedicated Pass 2 umbrella spec for the full handoff contract. The 'user must rediscover math encoding' action item is replaced by 'user provides 3-10 samples of past de-obfuscation notes; warmup derives the lexicon'
Some files were not shown because too many files have changed in this diff
Show More
Reference in New Issue
Block a user
Blocking a user prevents them from interacting with repositories, such as opening or commenting on pull requests or issues. Learn more about blocking a user.
ed
Tier 2 Tech Lead
