Private
Public Access
conductor(deob_pilot): Initialize Phase 2 (pilot) track with full scaffold
The lexicon child (Phase 1) is shipped; Phase 2 is now unblocked and ready for Tier 2 dispatch. 5 new files in video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621/: - spec.md: updated to reference the new files (lightweight scaffold) - plan.md: 5-phase pipeline (init → read → apply to cs229 → apply to entropy_epiplexity → refine + verify) with 20 tasks - metadata.json: scope, 11 verification criteria, 5-item risk register, 9 user directives - state.toml: 5 phases + 20 tasks + 12 verification flags + 9 user-directives-logged entries - TIER2_STARTER.md: dispatch prompt with file-read order, the 5 rules + 4 verification criteria, the principled/user-specific distinction context, 2 pilot videos, when-stuck guide, copy-paste-ready block CRITICAL context for Tier 2: the lexicon (Phase 1) honored the surgical edits: - 16 [user-also-accepted] tags in lexicon.md - 4 [principled] + 4 [user-preferred] tags in dedup_map.md - §3.5 Sectored Language moved to Appendix B - Esoteric content (Witness/Vessel/Aether) excluded per secular sanitization Phase 2 must preserve this distinction. The LLM produces the principled re-encoding by default; user-specific form is opt-in. Esoteric content stays in cluster_0_twitter.md only. The 2 pilot videos: cs229_building_llms (broad-and-shallow) + entropy_epiplexity (narrow-and-deep, tests boundedness on measure theory).
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,339 @@
|
||||
# Tier 2 Starter Prompt: Video Analysis De-obfuscation — Pilot on 2 Videos
|
||||
|
||||
**Purpose.** This file is the dispatch prompt for Tier 2 autonomous agents picking up the Phase 2 (pilot) child track. It supplements the auto-loaded `spec.md` + `plan.md` per `conductor/tier2/commands/tier-2-auto-execute.md` step 2.
|
||||
|
||||
**Track:** `video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621` (Pass 2 of 3, Phase 2 of 3 within Pass 2)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Track identity
|
||||
|
||||
- **ID:** `video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621`
|
||||
- **Type:** Research-only child track (Phase 2 of Pass 2; **the first actual application of the de-obfuscation scheme**)
|
||||
- **Status:** spec ✓ (lightweight scaffold); plan/metadata/state to be created by Tier 2
|
||||
- **Priority:** A (user-blocking; Pass 2 of the 3-pass research campaign)
|
||||
- **Domain:** Meta-tooling (research deliverable; no `src/` changes)
|
||||
|
||||
## Mission (what this track produces)
|
||||
|
||||
This Phase 2 child **validates the refined lexicon** (Phase 1) by applying it to 2 Pass 1 reports. The pilot produces **7 deliverables**:
|
||||
|
||||
For each of the 2 pilot videos, 3 files in `artifacts/<slug>/`:
|
||||
1. **`<slug>_translation.md`** — side-by-side table: original expression ↔ re-encoded form, with form anchor per row
|
||||
2. **`<slug>_deobfuscated.md`** — the re-encoded report (replacement; same 8-section structure as Pass 1, but every standard-math expression is replaced with the principled re-encoding)
|
||||
3. **`<slug>_decoder.md`** — per-term decoder: form anchor, etymology, definition history, link to original section
|
||||
|
||||
Plus:
|
||||
- **`pilot_report.md`** — lexicon refinements discovered, concepts that didn't fit (gaps), process improvements for the apply phase
|
||||
|
||||
The pilot's output is the first empirical evidence that the de-obfuscation scheme works on real Pass 1 material. The `pilot_report.md` informs Phase 3 (apply) by surfacing lexicon gaps + process improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The 2 pilot videos (why these 2)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **`cs229_building_llms`** — Foundational ML/LLM coverage. Wide scope, tests "form projection" across many concepts (sets, functions, optimization, learning). Good test for the lexicon's general applicability.
|
||||
2. **`entropy_epiplexity`** — Math-heavy, focused on information-theoretic concepts (entropy, mutual information, epiplexity). Good test for "boundedness" + type-theoretic encoding of measure theory (a common bottleneck in de-obfuscation efforts).
|
||||
|
||||
These 2 videos test the lexicon on different shapes: one broad-and-shallow, one narrow-and-deep. The pilot's refinements will inform the apply phase.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Files to read in this order
|
||||
|
||||
### 1. This Phase 2 child track (REQUIRED)
|
||||
|
||||
- `./spec.md` (lightweight scaffold; read first)
|
||||
- `./plan.md` (5-phase pipeline; 20 tasks)
|
||||
|
||||
### 2. The refined lexicon (PRIMARY INPUT — the operational spec)
|
||||
|
||||
- `/conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/lexicon.md` (the codified operational spec; 12 sections + 4 appendices)
|
||||
- `/conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/terms_catalog.md` (machine-readable lexicon; 4-tier table with 9 columns per term)
|
||||
- `/conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/dedup_map.md` (6 noise-dedup maps; 3 principled + 3 user-preferred)
|
||||
|
||||
### 3. The warmup's prompt template (the LLM-direct operational spec)
|
||||
|
||||
- `/conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_warmup_20260621/prompt_template.md` (5 rules + 6 noise-dedup maps + 4-layer format + 7 example transformations + verification checklist)
|
||||
|
||||
### 4. The 2 Pass 1 reports (the INPUT to de-obfuscate)
|
||||
|
||||
- `/conductor/tracks/video_analysis_cs229_building_llms_20260621/report.md` (foundational ML/LLM coverage; ~1000-10000 LOC)
|
||||
- `/conductor/tracks/video_analysis_entropy_epiplexity_20260621/report.md` (math-heavy, information-theoretic; ~1000-10000 LOC)
|
||||
|
||||
### 5. Project conventions (REQUIRED at session start per workflow.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- `/AGENTS.md` (critical anti-patterns, file naming, no day estimates)
|
||||
- `/conductor/workflow.md` (task workflow, Tier 2 sandbox conventions, failcount contract)
|
||||
- `/conductor/code_styleguides/python.md` (1-space indent, type hints, no comments — IF code is written; not applicable here)
|
||||
- `/conductor/code_styleguides/error_handling.md` (Result[T] pattern — not applicable)
|
||||
|
||||
### 6. Reference tracks (consult as needed)
|
||||
|
||||
- `/conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_warmup_20260621/TIER2_STARTER.md` (sibling track; the warmup's dispatch prompt; useful precedent)
|
||||
- `/conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/TIER2_STARTER.md` (sibling track; the lexicon child's dispatch prompt; useful precedent)
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The 5 rules + the 4 verification criteria (load-bearing)
|
||||
|
||||
### The 5 rules (per `lexicon.md` §1 — every re-encoding must satisfy all 5)
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Boundedness** — every value is a finite form. `∞_val` banned; `∞_proc` allowed (as `Stream A = nat -> A`); `∞_card` banned; `Real` as a value BANNED; `kind : Real` resolves to `quantity : float64`.
|
||||
2. **Form anchor** — every re-encoding has a form anchor: "What bounded form does this project from the indefinite?"
|
||||
3. **Etymology** — every new term has a 1-line origin + 1-line definition history.
|
||||
4. **Lossless** — every Pass 1 concept is represented. If a concept can't be bounded, mark it "indefinite — see original" rather than dropping it. **Plus** (per user 2026-06-23): every transformation includes a "Compression notes" field listing which axioms were dropped at each layer.
|
||||
5. **Encoding-explicit** — every value-bearing term has an `encoding:` attribute (default `float64`).
|
||||
|
||||
### The 4 verification criteria (per `lexicon.md` §0.1 + `prompt_template.md` verification checklist)
|
||||
|
||||
For each of the 6 deliverables (2 videos × 3 layers), verify:
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Lossless** — no Pass 1 concept dropped; compression history preserved per layer.
|
||||
- [ ] **Bounded** — no `∞_val` or `∞_card`; the "real number line" as a value is banned.
|
||||
- [ ] **Encoding-explicit** — every value-bearing term has an `encoding:` attribute. Default: `float64`.
|
||||
- [ ] **Constructively typed** — every expression has a type.
|
||||
- [ ] **Etymology-cited** — every new term has the 1-line origin + 1-line definition history.
|
||||
- [ ] **Form-anchored** — every re-encoding has a form anchor.
|
||||
- [ ] **User-specific conventions applied only when appropriate** — Sectored Language names + classical Greek/Latin/Sanskrit forms + GA reinterpretations are USER preferences, not scheme-canonical. Apply them only when the reader would prefer them.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The 3-layer deliverable structure (per `prompt_template.md` §"The 3-Layer Output Format")
|
||||
|
||||
For each video, the LLM produces 3 files in `artifacts/<slug>/`:
|
||||
|
||||
### Layer 1: `<slug>_translation.md` (side-by-side table)
|
||||
|
||||
| # | Original Section | Original Expression | Re-encoded Form | Form Anchor | Etymology |
|
||||
|---|------------------|--------------------|-----------------|-------------|-----------|
|
||||
|
||||
### Layer 2: `<slug>_deobfuscated.md` (the re-encoded report)
|
||||
|
||||
Same 8-section structure as Pass 1's report:
|
||||
1. TL;DR
|
||||
2. Key Concepts
|
||||
3. Frame Analysis
|
||||
4. Transcript Highlights
|
||||
5. Mathematical / Theoretical Content (re-encoded)
|
||||
6. Connections to Other Videos in Campaign
|
||||
7. Open Questions / Follow-up
|
||||
8. References
|
||||
|
||||
But every standard-math expression in §5 (and anywhere else) is replaced with the principled re-encoding per the lexicon.
|
||||
|
||||
### Layer 3: `<slug>_decoder.md` (per-term decoder)
|
||||
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Term: <name>
|
||||
|
||||
- **Original notation:** ...
|
||||
- **Re-encoded:** ...
|
||||
- **Form anchor:** the bounded form is X; the projection is Y
|
||||
- **Etymology (1-line):** <origin>
|
||||
- **Definition history (1-line):** <first formalization>
|
||||
- **Source sections in original:** §X.Y
|
||||
- **Cluster cross-ref:** research/cluster_*.md §X.Y
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
For user-also-accepted terms, additionally:
|
||||
- **User-specific form:** the Sectored Language V1 name, the GA reinterpretation, or the classical Greek/Latin/Sanskrit form
|
||||
- **4-language etymology:** Greek + Latin + English + Sanskrit
|
||||
|
||||
### The "indefinite — see original" pattern (per Rule 1)
|
||||
|
||||
If a concept can't be bounded:
|
||||
```markdown
|
||||
## Term: <name>
|
||||
|
||||
- **Status:** INDEFINITE — see original
|
||||
- **Reason:** <why the term is hard to bound>
|
||||
- **Source sections in original:** §X.Y
|
||||
- **Cluster cross-ref:** research/cluster_*.md §X.Y
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
The user values honest uncertainty over confident guesses.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The principled vs user-specific distinction (the surgical-edits context)
|
||||
|
||||
Per the 2026-06-23 surgical edits + Phase 1's formalization:
|
||||
|
||||
- **The LLM produces the principled re-encoding by default** (the scheme-canonical form, from the 5 rules + the 3 principled noise-dedup maps).
|
||||
- **The user-specific form is opt-in** (Sectored Language V1, GA reinterpretations, classical Greek/Latin/Sanskrit forms). The LLM produces the user-specific form only when the reader would prefer it.
|
||||
- **The 4-language pattern is REQUIRED for user-also-accepted terms** (Greek + Latin + English + Sanskrit, per the warmup's `Notiones.txt` reference).
|
||||
- **The 3 user-preferred noise-dedup maps are optional output conventions** (the GA collapse, the "invent → construct" rename, the "number = quantity = value" collapse).
|
||||
- **Esoteric content (Witness/Vessel/Aether ontology) is NOT in the public lexicon.** It stays in `cluster_0_twitter.md` for the user's reference. **Do NOT include it in the pilot deliverables.**
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The 31 unresolved items (per `lexicon.md` §11.3)
|
||||
|
||||
The warmup's 31 unresolved items (12 from §A.3 + 19 from §11.3) are the lexicon's open questions. Some of these may surface during the pilot. If they do:
|
||||
- If the answer is clear from the Pass 1 report's content: define the term in the pilot's `pilot_report.md` (a "lexicon v2 addition" entry).
|
||||
- If unclear: add to the pilot's "gaps" section for the apply phase.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## The compression history (per Rule 4 + user 2026-06-23)
|
||||
|
||||
Every transformation in the 3-layer output should include a "**Compression notes**" field that lists which axioms were dropped at each layer. For example:
|
||||
- Layer 1 (compressed original): "Uses associativity and commutativity to combine terms"
|
||||
- Layer 2 (fully expanded): "Expands the compressed form; compression note: applied associativity and commutativity; to audit the lossless history, see the original §3.2"
|
||||
- Layer 3 (executable code): "Implements the expanded form; compression note: same as Layer 2"
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Critical user directives (load-bearing)
|
||||
|
||||
The warmup captured these in `state.toml` `[user_directives_logged]`; they apply to Phase 2 unchanged.
|
||||
|
||||
1. **Constructive type theory as foundation.**
|
||||
2. **Boundedness for direct knowledge.**
|
||||
3. **Cycles/iteration allowed but expressed explicitly** (`∞_val` banned, `∞_proc` allowed).
|
||||
4. **Etymology-aware lexicon** (1-line origin + 1-line history; 4-language for user-also-accepted terms).
|
||||
5. **Lossless preservation with explicit compression history** (per user 2026-06-23).
|
||||
6. **Encoding-explicit** (every value-bearing term has an `encoding:` attribute; per user 2026-06-23).
|
||||
7. **Honest epistemic hedging** (per the "Don't know what `<<` here is" pattern).
|
||||
8. **The principled vs user-specific distinction** (the LLM produces the principled form; user-specific is opt-in).
|
||||
9. **Secular sanitization** (esoteric content NOT in the pilot deliverables).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Key risks
|
||||
|
||||
- **R1 (medium):** LLM may produce user-specific forms as if they were principled. **Mitigation:** the prompt_template.md's verification checklist explicitly checks for this; the LLM is told to apply user-specific forms only when the reader would prefer them.
|
||||
- **R2 (medium):** Lexicon can't capture a concept in bounded form. **Mitigation:** Rule 1 explicitly allows "indefinite — see original"; the pilot_report.md captures these gaps for the apply phase.
|
||||
- **R3 (low):** Decoder has too many terms (verbose). **Mitigation:** decoder format is per-term; the LLM groups by section and skips terms that don't appear in the de-obfuscated.md.
|
||||
- **R4 (medium):** LLM output is too brief (skips concepts). **Mitigation:** verification checklist includes the Lossless criterion; the 4 verbatim checks per video; pilot_report.md captures skips as gaps.
|
||||
- **R5 (medium):** Entropy_epiplexity's measure theory defeats the boundedness rule. **Mitigation:** this is WHY the pilot tests this video; if the lexicon can't capture it, capture the gap in pilot_report.md; the apply phase uses the refined lexicon (or a v2).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Hard constraints
|
||||
|
||||
- **No `src/*.py` changes.** This is a research-only track; no production code.
|
||||
- **No `pyproject.toml` dependencies.** All work is research (markdown files).
|
||||
- **No `uv pip install` for new packages.** The pilot is markdown only.
|
||||
- **No day estimates in any artifact.** Scope measured in files/sites per `conductor/workflow.md`.
|
||||
- **Per-task atomic commits.** Each deliverable (6 per-video + 1 pilot_report) is committed in its own commit with a git note.
|
||||
- **No comments in code** (if any code is written; not applicable here).
|
||||
- **The LLM invocation is the heart of this track.** The LLM is invoked with the prompt_template.md + the Pass 1 report. The output is the 3-layer deliverable. The Tier 2 worker delegates the LLM invocation to a Tier 3 worker (per `conductor/workflow.md` "Standard Task Workflow" step 4).
|
||||
- **Esoteric content NOT in deliverables.** Witness/Vessel/Aether ontology stays in `cluster_0_twitter.md` only.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Tier 2 sandbox conventions (per `conductor/tier2/agents/tier2-autonomous.md`)
|
||||
|
||||
- **Test runner:** `uv run python scripts/run_tests_batched.py` (NEVER `uv run pytest` directly). Not applicable for this research-only track — no tests to run.
|
||||
- **Default branch:** `master`. Use `origin/master` for `git fetch` and as the base for new branches.
|
||||
- **Line endings:** preserve existing (CRLF stays CRLF, LF stays LF).
|
||||
- **Throw-away scripts:** `scripts/tier2/artifacts/<track-name>/` (not the base `scripts/tier2/` directory). Not applicable here.
|
||||
- **End-of-track report:** `docs/reports/TRACK_COMPLETION_<track-name>.md` per `conductor/tier2/agents/tier2-autonomous.md` step 42.
|
||||
- **State update:** `state.toml` → `status = "completed"` at the end.
|
||||
- **Hard bans:** `git push*`, `git checkout*`, `git restore*`, `git reset*` (3-layer enforced).
|
||||
- **File access:** Tier 2 clone only. **NEVER USE APPDATA** — denied at the bash level.
|
||||
- **Failcount contract:** After every task commit, check `should_give_up` from `scripts.tier2.failcount`. Thresholds: 3 consecutive red, 3 consecutive green, 30 min no progress.
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification criteria (gate for Phase 2 completion)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Both pilot videos have 3-layer deliverables (6 files total in `artifacts/`)
|
||||
- [ ] All 3 deliverables per video pass the 4 criteria (Lossless, Bounded, Constructively typed, Etymology-cited)
|
||||
- [ ] All 3 deliverables per video pass the additional 3 criteria (Encoding-explicit, Form-anchored, User-specific conventions applied only when appropriate)
|
||||
- [ ] `pilot_report.md` captures lexicon refinements + gaps + process improvements
|
||||
- [ ] `pilot_report.md` includes updates to the 31 unresolved items from the warmup
|
||||
- [ ] User has reviewed and approved the 2 deliverables + pilot_report.md
|
||||
- [ ] All 7 deliverables committed atomically (6 per-video + 1 pilot_report)
|
||||
- [ ] Git notes attached to each commit
|
||||
- [ ] `state.toml` updated to `status = "completed"`
|
||||
- [ ] `docs/reports/TRACK_COMPLETION_video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621.md` exists
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Execution plan (per pilot plan.md)
|
||||
|
||||
| Phase | Task | Notes |
|
||||
|---|---|---|
|
||||
| 0 | Initialize | Create `state.toml` per Tier 2 conventions |
|
||||
| 1 | Read the refined lexicon | 6 file reads: lexicon.md + terms_catalog.md + dedup_map.md + prompt_template.md + 2 Pass 1 reports |
|
||||
| 2 | Apply to `cs229_building_llms` | Delegate to Tier 3 worker: LLM invocation with prompt_template + cs229 report. Produces 3 files in `artifacts/cs229_building_llms/`. Commit per file. |
|
||||
| 3 | Apply to `entropy_epiplexity` | Same as Phase 2. Produces 3 files in `artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/`. |
|
||||
| 4 | Refine + pilot report | Write `pilot_report.md` capturing refinements + gaps + process improvements + 31-item updates. |
|
||||
| 5 | User review + verification | Pause for user feedback. Idempotency check. Audit. End-of-track report. |
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## When stuck
|
||||
|
||||
- **The LLM output violates the principled/user-specific distinction.** Re-prompt the LLM with an explicit instruction: "Produce the principled re-encoding; the user-specific form is opt-in." Per the warmup's surgical edits, the principled form is the scheme's canonical output.
|
||||
- **The LLM can't bound a concept.** Apply Rule 1: mark "indefinite — see original" in the decoder. Capture the gap in `pilot_report.md` for the apply phase.
|
||||
- **The LLM output is too verbose.** The decoder format is per-term; the LLM should group by section and skip terms that don't appear in the de-obfuscated.md. Re-prompt with a "be concise" instruction if needed.
|
||||
- **The LLM output is too brief (skips concepts).** The Lossless criterion is violated. Re-prompt with "every Pass 1 concept must be represented; use 'indefinite — see original' for concepts that can't be bounded." Check the verbatim 4 criteria per video.
|
||||
- **The `pilot_report.md` is too short to capture the refinements.** Expand the format: include the original Pass 1 concept, the re-encoded form, the gap (if any), the proposed fix (for the apply phase or a lexicon v2).
|
||||
- **The lexicon can't capture `entropy_epiplexity`'s measure theory.** This is a known risk (R5); the gap is captured in `pilot_report.md` for the apply phase. The apply phase uses the refined lexicon (or a v2 if the pilot surfaces enough gaps).
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Quick reference: dispatch
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
/tier-2-auto-execute video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
Plus this context (paste BEFORE invoking):
|
||||
|
||||
```
|
||||
TRACK: video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621
|
||||
TYPE: Research-only child track (Pass 2 Phase 2 of 3)
|
||||
STATUS: spec ✓ (lightweight); plan/metadata/state to be created
|
||||
PRIORITY: A (user-blocking)
|
||||
|
||||
MISSION: Validate the refined lexicon (Phase 1) by applying it to 2 Pass 1 reports.
|
||||
PRODUCES: 7 deliverables (2 videos × 3-layer + 1 pilot_report.md)
|
||||
CONSUMES: lexicon.md + terms_catalog.md + dedup_map.md + prompt_template.md + 2 Pass 1 reports
|
||||
|
||||
CRITICAL: The 5 rules + 4 verification criteria are NON-NEGOTIABLE. Every re-encoding must satisfy all 9.
|
||||
- The LLM produces the principled re-encoding by default
|
||||
- The user-specific form is opt-in (Sectored Language, GA, classical Greek/Latin)
|
||||
- The 4-language pattern is REQUIRED for user-also-accepted terms
|
||||
- Esoteric content (Witness/Vessel/Aether) is NOT in the public deliverables
|
||||
|
||||
USER DIRECTIVES (load-bearing):
|
||||
1. Constructive type theory as foundation
|
||||
2. Boundedness for direct knowledge
|
||||
3. Cycles/iteration explicit; no "infinite" values
|
||||
4. Etymology-aware lexicon (1-line origin + 1-line history; 4-language for user-specific)
|
||||
5. Lossless with compression history
|
||||
6. Encoding-explicit (every value-bearing term has encoding: attribute)
|
||||
7. Honest epistemic hedging
|
||||
8. Principled vs user-specific distinction (Phase 1 formalized this; Phase 2 must preserve it)
|
||||
9. Secular sanitization
|
||||
|
||||
THE 2 VIDEOS:
|
||||
- cs229_building_llms: foundational ML/LLM coverage; wide scope; tests "form projection" across many concepts
|
||||
- entropy_epiplexity: math-heavy, information-theoretic; tests boundedness + type-theoretic encoding of measure theory
|
||||
|
||||
FILES TO READ FIRST:
|
||||
1. ./TIER2_STARTER.md (this file)
|
||||
2. ./spec.md (the lightweight scaffold)
|
||||
3. /conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/lexicon.md (the codified operational spec; PRIMARY input)
|
||||
4. /conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/terms_catalog.md (machine-readable)
|
||||
5. /conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/dedup_map.md (6 noise-dedup maps)
|
||||
6. /conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_warmup_20260621/prompt_template.md (the LLM-direct operational spec)
|
||||
7. /conductor/tracks/video_analysis_cs229_building_llms_20260621/report.md (Pass 1 report #1)
|
||||
8. /conductor/tracks/video_analysis_entropy_epiplexity_20260621/report.md (Pass 1 report #2)
|
||||
|
||||
EXECUTION: Read inputs → invoke LLM with prompt_template + cs229 report → 3-layer deliverable → invoke LLM with prompt_template + entropy_epiplexity report → 3-layer deliverable → write pilot_report.md → user review → closeout.
|
||||
```
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Post-Phase-2
|
||||
|
||||
After Phase 2 ships, Phase 3 (apply) can start:
|
||||
- `video_analysis_deob_apply_20260621/` (consumes the pilot's `pilot_report.md` refinements + the (refined-by-pilot) lexicon)
|
||||
- Applies the lexicon to 10 remaining Pass 1 reports + 1 cross-cutting synthesis
|
||||
- Produces 11 × 3-layer deliverables (33 files) + `apply_report.md`
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,130 @@
|
||||
{
|
||||
"track_id": "video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621",
|
||||
"name": "Video Analysis De-obfuscation — Pilot on 2 Videos (Pass 2 Phase 2 of 3)",
|
||||
"created": "2026-06-21",
|
||||
"status": "spec_approved",
|
||||
"blocked_by": [
|
||||
"video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"blocks": [
|
||||
"video_analysis_deob_apply_20260621"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"priority": "A",
|
||||
"rationale": "User-blocking Phase 2 of Pass 2. Consumes the refined lexicon (Phase 1) and applies it to 2 Pass 1 reports (cs229_building_llms + entropy_epiplexity) to validate the lexicon and capture refinements. Produces 3-layer deobfuscation per video (translation / replacement / decoder) + pilot_report.md with refinements. Research-only; no src/ changes.",
|
||||
"type": "research-only child track (Pass 2 Phase 2 of 3)",
|
||||
"domain": "meta-tooling (research deliverable; no manual_slop src/ changes)",
|
||||
"scope": {
|
||||
"new_folders": [
|
||||
"conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621/"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"new_files": [
|
||||
"spec.md (lightweight scaffold)",
|
||||
"plan.md",
|
||||
"metadata.json",
|
||||
"state.toml",
|
||||
"TIER2_STARTER.md",
|
||||
"artifacts/cs229_building_llms/translation.md",
|
||||
"artifacts/cs229_building_llms/deobfuscated.md",
|
||||
"artifacts/cs229_building_llms/decoder.md",
|
||||
"artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/translation.md",
|
||||
"artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/deobfuscated.md",
|
||||
"artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/decoder.md",
|
||||
"pilot_report.md (lexicon refinements + gaps + process improvements)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"modified_files": [],
|
||||
"deleted_files": [],
|
||||
"gitignored_patterns": []
|
||||
},
|
||||
"estimated_effort": {
|
||||
"method": "scope (per conductor/workflow.md Tier 1 Track Initialization Rules). NO day estimates.",
|
||||
"phase_0": "1 task: init state.toml",
|
||||
"phase_1": "6 tasks: read lexicon + terms_catalog + dedup_map + prompt_template + 2 Pass 1 reports",
|
||||
"phase_2": "3 tasks: apply lexicon to cs229 (3-layer deliverable) + commit + verify",
|
||||
"phase_3": "3 tasks: apply lexicon to entropy_epiplexity (3-layer deliverable) + commit + verify",
|
||||
"phase_4": "2 tasks: write pilot_report.md + commit",
|
||||
"phase_5": "5 tasks: user review + state update + idempotency + audit + end-of-track report",
|
||||
"summary": "5 phases, 20 tasks, 7 deliverables (6 per-video 3-layer files + 1 pilot report). No day estimates per project convention."
|
||||
},
|
||||
"verification_criteria": [
|
||||
"Both pilot videos have 3-layer deliverables (6 files total in artifacts/)",
|
||||
"All 3 deliverables per video pass the 4 criteria (Lossless, Bounded, Constructively typed, Etymology-cited)",
|
||||
"pilot_report.md captures lexicon refinements + gaps + process improvements",
|
||||
"User has reviewed and approved the 2 deliverables + pilot_report.md",
|
||||
"All 7 deliverables committed atomically (6 per-video + 1 pilot_report)",
|
||||
"Git notes attached to each commit",
|
||||
"state.toml updated to status = 'completed'",
|
||||
"End-of-track report at docs/reports/TRACK_COMPLETION_video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621.md",
|
||||
"No new src/*.py files created (per AGENTS.md File Size and Naming Convention)",
|
||||
"No new pyproject.toml dependencies"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"risk_register": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "R1",
|
||||
"title": "LLM produces de-obfuscation that violates the principled/user-specific distinction",
|
||||
"likelihood": "medium",
|
||||
"scope_impact": "the 3-layer output may include user-specific forms as if they were principled",
|
||||
"mitigation": "TIER2_STARTER.md tells Tier 2 the LLM's prompt_template.md already encodes the distinction; the verification checklist explicitly checks that user-specific entries are tagged and the principled spine is preserved"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "R2",
|
||||
"title": "Lexicon can't capture a concept in bounded form",
|
||||
"likelihood": "medium",
|
||||
"scope_impact": "some concepts in the Pass 1 reports must be flagged 'indefinite — see original'",
|
||||
"mitigation": "Rule 1 (Boundedness) explicitly allows 'indefinite — see original' rather than forcing a translation; the pilot_report.md captures these gaps for the apply phase"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "R3",
|
||||
"title": "LLM output is too verbose (decoder has too many terms)",
|
||||
"likelihood": "low",
|
||||
"scope_impact": "decoder.md may be 1000+ LOC for a single video",
|
||||
"mitigation": "decoder format is per-term; the LLM should group by section and skip terms that don't appear in the de-obfuscated.md"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "R4",
|
||||
"title": "LLM output is too brief (skips concepts)",
|
||||
"likelihood": "medium",
|
||||
"scope_impact": "violates the lossless directive (Rule 4)",
|
||||
"mitigation": "verification checklist includes the Lossless criterion; the 4 verbatim checks per video; pilot_report.md captures skips as gaps"
|
||||
},
|
||||
{
|
||||
"id": "R5",
|
||||
"title": "Entropy_epiplexity's measure theory defeats the boundedness rule",
|
||||
"likelihood": "medium",
|
||||
"scope_impact": "the report's information-theoretic concepts may not have bounded forms in the lexicon",
|
||||
"mitigation": "this is WHY the pilot tests this video; if the lexicon can't capture it, capture the gap in pilot_report.md; the apply phase uses the refined lexicon (or a v2)"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"architecture_reference": {
|
||||
"primary_documents": [
|
||||
"conductor/workflow.md (track convention, per-task commits, git notes)",
|
||||
"conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_20260621/spec.md (umbrella design)",
|
||||
"conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/lexicon.md (the refined operational spec; PRIMARY input)",
|
||||
"conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/terms_catalog.md (machine-readable lexicon)",
|
||||
"conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/dedup_map.md (6 noise-dedup maps refined)"
|
||||
],
|
||||
"related_tracks": [
|
||||
"conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_warmup_20260621/ (upstream precursor; the prompt_template.md is the LLM-direct operational spec)",
|
||||
"conductor/tracks/video_analysis_deob_apply_20260621/ (downstream consumer; consumes pilot_report.md refinements)"
|
||||
]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"deferred_to_followup_tracks": [
|
||||
{
|
||||
"title": "Phase 3 (apply)",
|
||||
"description": "Applies the refined lexicon (informed by the pilot) to 10 remaining Pass 1 reports + 1 cross-cutting synthesis.",
|
||||
"track_status": "blocked by this track"
|
||||
}
|
||||
],
|
||||
"regressions_and_pre_existing_failures": [],
|
||||
"pre_existing_failures_remaining": [],
|
||||
"user_directives": [
|
||||
"Constructive type theory as foundation (2026-06-21)",
|
||||
"Boundedness for direct knowledge; cycles/iteration explicit (2026-06-21)",
|
||||
"Etymology-aware lexicon (2026-06-21)",
|
||||
"Lossless with explicit compression history (2026-06-23)",
|
||||
"Encoding-explicit (every value-bearing term has encoding: attribute) (2026-06-23)",
|
||||
"Honest epistemic hedging (2026-06-21)",
|
||||
"Secular sanitization - esoteric content NOT in public lexicon (2026-06-23)",
|
||||
"Principled vs user-specific distinction - Phase 1 formalized this (2026-06-23); Phase 2 must preserve it",
|
||||
"No day estimates per conductor/workflow.md Tier 1 Track Initialization Rules (added 2026-06-16). Scope measured in files/sites only."
|
||||
]
|
||||
}
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
|
||||
# Plan: Video Analysis De-obfuscation — Pilot on 2 Videos
|
||||
|
||||
This is the Phase 2 (pilot) child plan for Pass 2 of the 3-pass research campaign. Per the Tier 1 Track Initialization Rules, scope is measured in files/sites — no day estimates.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 0: Init
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 0.1:** Initialize the Phase 2 child track: create `state.toml` (Tier 2).
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 1: Read the refined lexicon (the operational spec)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 1.1:** Read `lexicon.md` (the codified operational spec; 12 sections + 4 appendices).
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 1.2:** Read `terms_catalog.md` (the machine-readable form; 4-tier table with 9 columns per term).
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 1.3:** Read `dedup_map.md` (the 6 noise-dedup maps refined; 3 principled + 3 user-preferred).
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 1.4:** Read the warmup's `prompt_template.md` (the LLM-direct operational spec; 5 rules + 6 noise-dedup maps + 4-layer format + 7 example transformations).
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 1.5:** Read both Pass 1 reports: `cs229_building_llms/report.md` (foundational ML/LLM coverage; wide scope) + `entropy_epiplexity/report.md` (math-heavy, information-theoretic; tests boundedness + type-theoretic encoding of measure theory).
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 1.6:** Honor the surgical-edits formalization: the lexicon's `[user-also-accepted]` and `[user-preferred]` tags are explicit. The LLM produces the principled re-encoding by default; the user-specific form is opt-in.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 2: Apply to `cs229_building_llms`
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 2.1:** Tier 3 worker invokes an LLM with the `prompt_template.md` + the `cs229_building_llms` Pass 1 report. The LLM produces 3 files in `artifacts/cs229_building_llms/`:
|
||||
- `translation.md` (side-by-side table; uses the terms from `terms_catalog.md`)
|
||||
- `deobfuscated.md` (re-encoded; same 8-section structure as Pass 1, but every standard-math expression is replaced with the principled re-encoding)
|
||||
- `decoder.md` (per-term decoder; form anchor + etymology + definition history)
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 2.2:** Commit the 3 deliverables (one commit per file with git note) at `artifacts/cs229_building_llms/`.
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 2.3:** Verify the 4 criteria (Lossless, Bounded, Constructively typed, Etymology-cited) are met.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 3: Apply to `entropy_epiplexity`
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 3.1:** Tier 3 worker invokes an LLM with the `prompt_template.md` + the `entropy_epiplexity` Pass 1 report. The LLM produces 3 files in `artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/` (same structure as Phase 2).
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 3.2:** Commit the 3 deliverables at `artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/`.
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 3.3:** Verify the 4 criteria are met.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 4: Refine + pilot report
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 4.1:** Write `pilot_report.md` capturing:
|
||||
- **Lexicon refinements** discovered during the 2 pilot applications (terms that didn't fit; terms that needed new entries; terms that worked but need adjustment)
|
||||
- **Gaps** — concepts in the Pass 1 reports that the lexicon couldn't capture
|
||||
- **Process improvements** for the apply phase (e.g., how to scale the lexicon application to 10 + 1 synthesis)
|
||||
- **The 31 unresolved items from the warmup** — which got defined, which got deferred, which need a v2
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 4.2:** Commit `pilot_report.md` with git note.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase 5: User review + verification
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 5.1:** User reviews the 2 × 3-layer deliverables + `pilot_report.md`. Approves the refined lexicon, or iterates (loop back to Phase 2's lexicon child).
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 5.2:** Update `state.toml` to `status = "completed"`.
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 5.3:** Idempotency check (re-run the LLM invocation, confirm the 3-layer output is consistent).
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 5.4:** Audit checklist: 4 criteria met for both videos; lexicon refinements captured in `pilot_report.md`; no esoteric content leaked.
|
||||
- [ ] **Task 5.5:** Write end-of-track report at `docs/reports/TRACK_COMPLETION_video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621.md`.
|
||||
|
||||
## Verification (gate per workflow.md)
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] Both pilot videos have 3-layer deliverables (6 files total in `artifacts/`)
|
||||
- [ ] All 3 deliverables per video pass the 4 criteria (Lossless, Bounded, Constructively typed, Etymology-cited)
|
||||
- [ ] `pilot_report.md` captures lexicon refinements + gaps + process improvements
|
||||
- [ ] User has reviewed and approved
|
||||
- [ ] All 7 deliverables committed atomically (6 per-video + 1 pilot_report)
|
||||
- [ ] Git notes attached to each commit
|
||||
- [ ] `state.toml` updated to `status = "completed"`
|
||||
- [ ] End-of-track report at `docs/reports/TRACK_COMPLETION_video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621.md`
|
||||
|
||||
The Phase 2 child is "Pass 2 Phase 2 complete" when the 2 × 3-layer deliverables + pilot report are committed + user-approved. Phase 3 (apply) can then start.
|
||||
@@ -47,13 +47,13 @@ Plus:
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| `pilot_report.md` | Lexicon refinements discovered, concepts that didn't fit (gaps), process improvements for the apply phase |
|
||||
|
||||
**Optional (added per child track execution convention):** `plan.md`, `metadata.json`, `state.toml`.
|
||||
**Optional (added per child track execution convention):** `plan.md`, `metadata.json`, `state.toml`. (These are now present in the folder, scaffolded at spec time for Tier 2 to consume. Per the lexicon child pattern, `plan.md` enumerates the 5-phase pipeline; `metadata.json` is the scope/risk register; `state.toml` is the task tracker.)
|
||||
|
||||
## 4. Pipeline (5 phases)
|
||||
|
||||
Per the umbrella spec §5 (Phase 3 of the umbrella). Each phase commits atomically.
|
||||
|
||||
- [ ] **Phase 1: Init.** Initialize the child track.
|
||||
- [ ] **Phase 1: Init.** Initialize the child track (Tier 2 reads the scaffolded `plan.md` + `metadata.json` + `state.toml`).
|
||||
- [ ] **Phase 2: Apply to `cs229_building_llms`.** Tier 3 worker (LLM invoked with the prompt template + the report). Produces 3-layer deliverable in `artifacts/cs229_building_llms/`.
|
||||
- [ ] **Phase 3: Apply to `entropy_epiplexity`.** Same as above. Produces 3-layer deliverable in `artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/`.
|
||||
- [ ] **Phase 4: Refine.** Write `pilot_report.md` capturing: lexicon refinements, concepts that didn't fit (gaps), process improvements.
|
||||
@@ -101,4 +101,9 @@ For `<slug>_decoder.md`, the per-term format:
|
||||
- [Umbrella spec.md](../../video_analysis_deob_20260621/spec.md)
|
||||
- [Umbrella README.md](../../video_analysis_deob_20260621/README.md)
|
||||
- [Lexicon child spec.md](../../video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/spec.md)
|
||||
- [Lexicon child lexicon.md](../../video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/lexicon.md) (the refined operational spec; PRIMARY input)
|
||||
- [Lexicon child terms_catalog.md](../../video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/terms_catalog.md) (machine-readable lexicon)
|
||||
- [Lexicon child dedup_map.md](../../video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621/dedup_map.md) (6 noise-dedup maps)
|
||||
- [Warmup prompt_template.md](../../video_analysis_deob_warmup_20260621/prompt_template.md) (the LLM-direct operational spec)
|
||||
- Pass 1 reports: `cs229_building_llms` + `entropy_epiplexity`
|
||||
- [TIER2_STARTER.md](./TIER2_STARTER.md) (the dispatch prompt for Tier 2)
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -0,0 +1,82 @@
|
||||
# Track state for video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621
|
||||
# Updated by Tier 2 Tech Lead during execution
|
||||
|
||||
[meta]
|
||||
track_id = "video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621"
|
||||
name = "Video Analysis De-obfuscation — Pilot on 2 Videos (Pass 2 Phase 2 of 3)"
|
||||
status = "active"
|
||||
current_phase = 0 # Phase 0 = init
|
||||
last_updated = "2026-06-23"
|
||||
|
||||
[blocked_by]
|
||||
video_analysis_deob_lexicon_20260621 = "shipped 2026-06-23 (b7988c49)"
|
||||
|
||||
[blocks]
|
||||
video_analysis_deob_apply_20260621 = "blocked (consumes pilot_report.md refinements)"
|
||||
|
||||
[phases]
|
||||
phase_0 = { status = "pending", checkpointsha = "", name = "Init (state.toml)" }
|
||||
phase_1 = { status = "pending", checkpointsha = "", name = "Read the refined lexicon (the operational spec)" }
|
||||
phase_2 = { status = "pending", checkpointsha = "", name = "Apply to cs229_building_llms" }
|
||||
phase_3 = { status = "pending", checkpointsha = "", name = "Apply to entropy_epiplexity" }
|
||||
phase_4 = { status = "pending", checkpointsha = "", name = "Refine + pilot report" }
|
||||
phase_5 = { status = "pending", checkpointsha = "", name = "User review + verification" }
|
||||
|
||||
[tasks]
|
||||
# Phase 0 (init)
|
||||
t0_1 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Initialize Phase 2 child track: create state.toml per Tier 2 conventions" }
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 1 (read refined lexicon)
|
||||
t1_1 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Read lexicon.md (the codified operational spec; 12 sections + 4 appendices)" }
|
||||
t1_2 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Read terms_catalog.md (the machine-readable form; 4-tier table with 9 columns per term)" }
|
||||
t1_3 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Read dedup_map.md (the 6 noise-dedup maps refined; 3 principled + 3 user-preferred)" }
|
||||
t1_4 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Read the warmup's prompt_template.md (the LLM-direct operational spec; 5 rules + 6 noise-dedup maps + 4-layer format + 7 example transformations)" }
|
||||
t1_5 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Read both Pass 1 reports: cs229_building_llms/report.md (foundational ML/LLM) + entropy_epiplexity/report.md (math-heavy, information-theoretic)" }
|
||||
t1_6 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Honor the surgical-edits formalization: the lexicon's [user-also-accepted] and [user-preferred] tags are explicit. The LLM produces the principled re-encoding by default; the user-specific form is opt-in." }
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 2 (apply to cs229)
|
||||
t2_1 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Tier 3 worker invokes an LLM with the prompt_template.md + the cs229_building_llms Pass 1 report. Produces 3 files in artifacts/cs229_building_llms/: translation.md (side-by-side table) + deobfuscated.md (re-encoded) + decoder.md (per-term)" }
|
||||
t2_2 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Commit the 3 deliverables (one commit per file with git note) at artifacts/cs229_building_llms/" }
|
||||
t2_3 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Verify the 4 criteria (Lossless, Bounded, Constructively typed, Etymology-cited) are met" }
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 3 (apply to entropy_epiplexity)
|
||||
t3_1 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Tier 3 worker invokes an LLM with the prompt_template.md + the entropy_epiplexity Pass 1 report. Produces 3 files in artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/: translation.md + deobfuscated.md + decoder.md" }
|
||||
t3_2 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Commit the 3 deliverables at artifacts/entropy_epiplexity/" }
|
||||
t3_3 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Verify the 4 criteria are met" }
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 4 (refine + pilot report)
|
||||
t4_1 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Write pilot_report.md capturing: (a) Lexicon refinements discovered during the 2 pilot applications; (b) Gaps — concepts the lexicon couldn't capture; (c) Process improvements for the apply phase; (d) Updates to the 31 unresolved items from the warmup" }
|
||||
t4_2 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Commit pilot_report.md with git note" }
|
||||
|
||||
# Phase 5 (user review + verification)
|
||||
t5_1 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "User reviews the 2 × 3-layer deliverables + pilot_report.md. Approves the refined lexicon or iterates (loop back to Phase 2's lexicon child)" }
|
||||
t5_2 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Update state.toml to status = 'completed'" }
|
||||
t5_3 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Idempotency check (re-run the LLM invocation, confirm the 3-layer output is consistent)" }
|
||||
t5_4 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Audit checklist: 4 criteria met for both videos; lexicon refinements captured in pilot_report.md; no esoteric content leaked" }
|
||||
t5_5 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Write end-of-track report at docs/reports/TRACK_COMPLETION_video_analysis_deob_pilot_20260621.md" }
|
||||
|
||||
[verification]
|
||||
cs229_translation_committed = false
|
||||
cs229_deobfuscated_committed = false
|
||||
cs229_decoder_committed = false
|
||||
entropy_translation_committed = false
|
||||
entropy_deobfuscated_committed = false
|
||||
entropy_decoder_committed = false
|
||||
pilot_report_committed = false
|
||||
user_approved = false
|
||||
state_toml_completed = false
|
||||
end_of_track_report_committed = false
|
||||
all_4_criteria_cs229 = false
|
||||
all_4_criteria_entropy = false
|
||||
|
||||
[user_directives_logged]
|
||||
constructive_type_theory = "Per user 2026-06-21: 'I like Norman Wildberger's work. And I like the constructivist current progress on type theories as a foundational system.'"
|
||||
bounded_for_knowledge = "Per user 2026-06-21: 'No observer or mechanism or construct can be infinite in resolution or quantification. To have distinction must have a bounds.'"
|
||||
cycles_iteration_allowed = "Per user 2026-06-21: 'Infinite is okay well handled CORRECTLY... What can be indefinite is that can be subjected upon is that of cycles, that of iteration, that of repetition.'"
|
||||
etymology_aware = "Per user 2026-06-21: etymology + definitional history documented"
|
||||
lossless_compression_history = "Per user 2026-06-23: explicit compression notes per layer in the de-obfuscation's 3-layer output"
|
||||
encoding_explicit = "Per user 2026-06-23: every value-bearing term has an encoding: attribute (default float64)"
|
||||
honest_epistemic_hedging = "Per user 2026-06-21: 'Don't know what `<<` here is' / 'Me fucking around' style annotations are valid"
|
||||
secular_sanitization = "Per user 2026-06-23: esoteric content (Witness/Vessel/Aether, classical philosophy) NOT in public lexicon; stays in cluster_0_twitter.md"
|
||||
principled_vs_user_specific = "Per user 2026-06-23 surgical edits: Phase 1 formalized this; Phase 2 must preserve it (the LLM produces the principled re-encoding; user-specific form is opt-in)"
|
||||
no_day_estimates = "Per conductor/workflow.md Tier 1 Track Initialization Rules (added 2026-06-16). Scope measured in files/sites only."
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user