Files
manual_slop/conductor/tracks/nagent_review_20260608/comparison_table.md
T

5.4 KiB

nagent_review_v3 — Comparison Table

Date: 2026-06-19 Spec pair: spec_v3.md + plan_v3.md Companion: nagent_review_v3_20260619.md (the v3 canonical review); decisions.md (v3 candidate list); nagent_takeaways_v3_20260619.md (bridge to v2.3 takeaways + sibling reviews). Source: nagent v3 (a1f0680 on macton/nagent@main, 2026-06-18) + the two case-study repos at main (macton/pep-copt, macton/differentiable-collisions-optc).

Flat side-by-side reference. One row per v3 cluster + one row per v2.3 pattern that v3 updates. Verdicts and pitfalls are in nagent_review_v3_20260619.md.


Legend

  • Verdict values: PARITY (same shape), PARITY+ (Manual Slop is stronger), PARITY- (nagent is stronger), PARTIAL (one half, not the other), GAP (Manual Slop lacks the feature), ARCH-DIFF (different architecture, both correct in their domain), SUBSUMED (consumed by a follow-up track).
  • Domain tags: APP = Application domain, MT = Meta-Tooling domain, BOTH.
  • Cluster status: NEW (didn't exist at v2.3), UPDATE (extends v2.3 pattern).

v3 new clusters

# Cluster nagent source Manual Slop equivalent Verdict Status Domain
1 Campaigns 24cf16d, 199a36b, f3ec090, c1d2cad, 6443d70, 7a7e242 conductor/tracks/ is project-scoped but plan.md is not operable PARTIAL NEW BOTH
2 Conversation safety net 38d3d4f, 6426a67 No checkpoint/rebuild; no extracted-summary index GAP NEW APP
3 Hooks a4fb141 + both case-study harnesses Tier 4 QA error interception is analogous; no per-run hook PARTIAL NEW BOTH
4 Project-local roots 54c8741, 557dd39, 0b9d1a2, 023e23a conductor/tracks/ is already project-scoped; [conductor].dir per-project override PARITY NEW BOTH
5 Provider expansion bdfa2a6, 5075f6e, 2edc7ee Manual Slop has 8 providers (per tech-stack.md); per-model context windows new PARITY (DIFFERENT COUNT) UPDATE APP
6 Delegation rewrite d56f0f0, 65787a6, 315fe9e MMA WorkerPool disciplined; non-MMA recursion bug real PARTIAL UPDATE APP
7 Robustness 065168c, 6b762da, 12c35b7, 49e07f3 Manual Slop uses Result[T] discipline + audit scripts (per conductor/code_styleguides/error_handling.md) ARCH-DIFF UPDATE BOTH
8 Operating rules a1f0680 conductor/code_styleguides/data_oriented_design.md is derived from this file PARITY (DERIVED) UPDATE BOTH
9 Case-study methodology both case-study repos (cross-cutting) No equivalent yet GAP NEW BOTH
10 PEP case study macton/pep-copt n/a (empirical evidence for nagent, not Manual Slop) n/a NEW n/a
11 Collisions case study macton/differentiable-collisions-optc n/a n/a NEW n/a

v2.3 patterns updated by v3

# v2.3 pattern v3 update
1 Durable work, disposable workers UPDATES: campaigns (§1) extend with explicit plan artifacts
3 Conversations are editable state UPDATES: project-local roots (§4) make conversation state project-scoped; hooks (§3) per-turn observability
4 Visible output protocol (no update in v3)
5 The loop UPDATES: safety net (§2) adds failure-recovery; robustness (§7) hardens 4 failure modes; hooks (§3) per-turn ground-truth
6 Per-file memory (no update in v3)
7 Repository history as data UPDATES: project-local roots (§4) make .nagent/ commit-able
8 Historical coupling & neighborhoods (no update in v3)
9 Disposable sub-conversations UPDATES: delegation rewrite (§6) fixes recursion bug + names two reasons
11 Large files as explicit artifacts (no update in v3)
12 Tool discovery (no update in v3)
13 Differences from frameworks (no update in v3)
14 Build your own (no update in v3)

Sibling-review cross-refs

Sibling Section Relationship
fable_review_20260617 Fable's analysis of Mythos system prompt Comparator: "what a competitor's agent directives look like" vs. nagent's canonical operating rules; Fable's watch-dogging is the anti-pattern of nagent's data-grounded operating rules (§8)
intent_dsl_survey_20260612 Survey's Cluster 4 (meta-tooling DSLs) + Cluster 3 (intent-mapping) Parallel: the 4-prompt case-study methodology (§9) is implicitly an intent-DSL for "drive nagent at an optimization problem"
superpowers_review_20260619 superpowers brainstorming skill Process parallel: structured questions to refine an idea before implementation, same role as the case-study 4 prompts

Honest notes

  • The v3 verdict for "Provider expansion" is PARITY (DIFFERENT COUNT) — Manual Slop has 8 providers per tech-stack.md (the qwen_llama_grok track adds 3 more); nagent v3 has 6 providers. The count is independent of the abstraction (per-model context windows, billing isolation, ground-truth harness).
  • The "Conversation safety net" GAP is the highest-value v3 candidate — the 3-number config (checkpoint_interval_minutes, checkpoint_max_new_kb, rebuild_at_kb) + the sync-checkpoint invariant are concrete patterns Manual Slop can adopt.
  • The "Case-study methodology" GAP is the methodology-level insight; the per-case-study sections (§10, §11) are the empirical evidence.
  • v3 candidates are in decisions.md; the bridge doc is nagent_takeaways_v3_20260619.md.