User: 'isn't AGENT_TOOL_NAMES a redundant thing thats directly associated
with the mcp_client.py?' - YES, confirmed.
The existing test test_tool_names_subset_of_models_agent_tool_names
literally asserts: tool_names() ⊆ AGENT_TOOL_NAMES. So AGENT_TOOL_NAMES
is just a hardcoded snapshot of mcp_tool_specs.tool_names().
Action: DELETE AGENT_TOOL_NAMES from models.py (not just move it).
Derive at consumer sites: list(mcp_tool_specs.tool_names()).
8 consumer sites to update:
- 3 in src/app_controller.py:2110, 2972, 3273
- 5 in tests/test_arch_boundary_phase2.py:23, 29, 31, 32, 33
The cross-check test becomes either redundant or converts to a
positive assertion (e.g., assert that the derived list has at
least the canonical tool count).
models.py reduces further: from ~60 to ~30 lines after deletion.
This further reduces the models.py footprint. Combined with the
previous audit (move vendor files to ai_client.py, split out mma.py
+ project.py + project_files.py), models.py becomes essentially
empty - just the Pydantic proxy code that may also move to api_hooks.py.
Net effect: models.py could be ELIMINATED entirely (becomes ~0 lines
or just an __init__.py marker). The followup should consider whether
to delete models.py completely.
ed
b1ee947b32