adc7ff8029
User asked: is there anything in our workflow or agent markdown that should be updated or introduced based on this session? This commit is the AUDIT ONLY. No workflow files are modified. The 10 recommendations are not yet applied. User picks which to act on, which to defer, which to discard. docs/reports/workflow_markdown_audit_20260608.md (~370 lines): Read all the workflow/agent markdown in scope (AGENTS.md, CLAUDE.md, GEMINI.md, all 5 .agents/skills/*/SKILL.md, the 4 .agents/agents/*.md, conductor/workflow.md, product.md, product-guidelines.md, tech-stack.md, index.md, tracks.md, edit_workflow.md, the 2 existing code_styleguides/*.md, and the 4 .agents/policies/*.toml + 7 .agents/tools/*.json). Cross-referenced each against the 7 new session artifacts (nagent_review, 3 docs guides, ASCII-sketch workflow, SSDL digest, C11 interop v1+v2, 2 new tracks) and the 3 user-correction patterns (duffle-as-style-ref, v2 request/response model, "only under hard constraint"). The 10 recommendations: 1 (HIGH) Update architecture-fallback with new docs 2 (HIGH) Document ASCII-sketch workflow in workflow.md 3 (HIGH) Document SSDL digest in product-guidelines.md 4 (HIGH) Add user_corrections_log to State.toml Template 5 (MED) Document contingency track pattern 6 (MED) Update Compaction Recovery to reference session_synthesis 7 (MED) Document v1->v2 framing iteration anti-pattern 8 (MED) Document preserve-before-compact archive pattern 9 (LOW) Document MiniMax understand_image for ASCII verification 10 (LOW) Document per-proposal commit chain with git notes 4 HIGH-priority = ~75 min to act on. All 10 = ~2-3 hours. The audit is conservative: it does NOT recommend changing TDD, the per-task commit discipline, the 4-tier MMA model, product.md, tech-stack.md, the existing styleguides, or adding new audit scripts. The session did not surface conflicts with any of these. Meta-pattern: workflow/agent markdown is the theoretical contract; session artifacts are the empirical evidence; when the two diverge, update the theory to match the evidence. This session's evidence (new methodology, new vocabulary, new patterns, new anti-patterns) drives the 10 recommendations.