Private
Public Access
0
0
Files
manual_slop/conductor
conductor-tier2 5b3c11a0f3 conductor(track): manual_ux_validation_20260608_PLACEHOLDER - ASCII-sketch workflow + first-target redesign
The user said (verbatim): "On number 1. I love the idea and definitely
see poitental." This commit creates a full track that promotes the
ASCII-sketch UX ideation workflow
(docs/reports/ascii_sketch_ux_workflow_20260608.md, 340 lines) to
a real track with a concrete first target.

The track complements (does not replace) the existing
manual_ux_validation_20260302 track (which is a general UX review
track; this 2026-06-08 track is *focused* on the ASCII-sketch
workflow specifically).

Files (5 total, ~52KB, 12,000+ words):
- spec.md (186 lines, 9 sections) - track design, 5 open
  questions, first target analysis, SSDL cross-reference
- plan.md (~280 lines, 4 phases, 21 tasks) - TDD-style with
  WHERE/WHAT/HOW/SAFETY annotations
- metadata.json (~120 lines) - structured metadata, 5 open
  questions with defaults, 5 SSDL principles available
- state.toml (~95 lines) - per-task tracking + phase status
- index.md (~50 lines) - track context + related docs

Key design decisions captured:

1. Two distinct vocabularies are conflated at first glance:
   - GUI ASCII (the workflow) for panel sketches
   - SSDL (computational shapes digest) for internal code sketches
   Spec §2.6 makes the distinction explicit; both are useful for
   this track (GUI ASCII for Phase 2 design; SSDL for Phase 3
   internal refactoring documentation).

2. The 5 open questions from the workflow report (Q1 vocabulary,
   Q2 comparison policy, Q3 storage location, Q4 tooling,
   Q5 frequency) are documented with sensible defaults in
   spec.md §2.1-2.5 and metadata.json. The user can override
   any of them; defaults pre-stage the work.

3. First target is src/gui_2.py:3770 render_discussion_entry
   (Discussion Hub per-entry panel). Rationale:
   - Most-edited surface (every AI/user message)
   - User has strong opinions (per nagent_review_20260608 3 rounds
     of corrections)
   - 23-op matrix A1-A7 is the source of truth
   - ImGui layout maps cleanly to ASCII
   - SSDL defusing techniques can guide the internal refactoring

4. 4 phases: 1=resolve 5 questions, 2=execute workflow on first
   target (1-3 ASCII rounds), 3=implement per design contract
   (TDD with 7 test files for A1-A7 operations),
   4=document the pattern + propose 5-7 next targets.

Cross-references added throughout:
- docs/reports/computational_shapes_ssdl_digest_20260608.md
  (the SSDL digest, with explicit "this is a different vocabulary
  for a different purpose" note in spec §2.6)
- docs/reports/ascii_sketch_ux_workflow_20260608.md (the workflow)
- docs/guide_discussions.md (the 23-op matrix A1-A7)
- conductor/tracks/nagent_review_20260608/ (the source of the
  user's editable-discussion corrections)
- conductor/tracks/manual_ux_validation_20260302/ (complementary
  general UX review track)
- conductor/tracks/chunkification_optimization_20260608_PLACEHOLDER/
  (the contingency track; referenced in spec §2.6 SSDL cross-ref)

No code modified. Track is active; Phase 1 (5 user-questions) is
the current phase. User-confirmed worth doing in the prior turn.
2026-06-08 23:41:43 -04:00
..