Per user 'a bunch of docs just committed had redundant content across files. Can we do a reduction of that and instead map references to other files?' This commit reduces content duplication across 9 files. The canonical sources are kept as detailed references; the other files now point to them. Reductions (table replaced with 'see canonical' reference): 1. data_oriented_design.md §9: the 4-dim memory table (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0) 2. guide_agent_memory_dimensions.md §0: the 4-dim memory table (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0) 3. guide_caching_strategy.md §1: the 12-layer model (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md §1) 4. guide_ai_client.md 'Cache strategy' section: the 12-layer model recap (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md §1) 5. guide_knowledge_curation.md §1: the 5 category file details (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/knowledge_artifacts.md §1) 6. product-guidelines.md 'Memory Dimensions' section: the 4-dim table (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0) 7. guide_mma.md '4 memory dimensions' section: the MMA scope table (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0) 8. docs/AGENTS.md §0 + §5-§8: 4-dim table + caching/knowledge/RAG/ feature flag tables (canonical: the per-topic styleguides in conductor/code_styleguides/) 9. AGENTS.md 'Code Styleguides' section: the 6-styleguide list (canonical: docs/AGENTS.md §2) The principle: each piece of content has ONE source of truth; other places point to it. The data-oriented way. Files retain their narrative flow and the 'what this is' intros, but the detailed tables are now in their canonical home. Net effect: -2100 bytes across 9 files (without losing any information - the canonical sources are unchanged). The 'cross-references' sections are kept; the duplicated content is removed.
14 KiB
Caching Strategy Guide
Status: User-facing deep-dive on the cache strategy: stable-to-volatile context ordering, the 4 cache-TTL profiles (Anthropic, Gemini, OpenAI, claude-code), and the GUI exposure.
Date: 2026-06-12
Cross-refs: conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md; docs/guide_ai_client.md; conductor/tracks/nagent_review_20260608/nagent_review_v2_3_20260612.md §3.2, §5.
What this is. The LLM providers Manual Slop uses (Anthropic, Gemini, OpenAI) all support prompt caching. The cost benefit comes from the stable prefix being byte-identical across turns. This guide is the user-facing deep-dive on the 12-layer model, the byte-comparison test, the provider-specific TTLs, and the GUI exposure.
0. The 30-second version
[STABLE PREFIX (cached across turns)] [VOLATILE SUFFIX (per-turn)]
[Role instructions] [Discussion metadata]
[Function-calling schema] [Active preset (FileItems)]
[Discovered tool descriptions] [Per-file details]
[System prompt preset] [Tool-call results from prior turns]
[Persona profile] [The user message]
[Project context]
[Knowledge digest]
[file-knowledge for files in scope]
The cache boundary is at layer 8/9. Layers 1-7 are byte-identical across turns; layers 8-12 change per turn. The Anthropic-specific path wraps the prefix in cache_control: {"type": "ephemeral"} blocks; the Gemini path uses cachedContent resources; the OpenAI path uses implicit prefix caching.
The provider-specific defaults:
| Provider | Default TTL | Configurable? | GUI exposure? |
|---|---|---|---|
| Anthropic ephemeral | 5 min | yes (per-discussion) | yes |
| Gemini explicit | 1 h | yes (per-discussion override) | yes (TTL override) |
| OpenAI implicit | 5-10 min (provider-managed) | no | shows "cached" only |
| claude-code (Claude Agent SDK) | varies (provider-managed) | no | shows "cached" only |
1. The 12-layer model (the stable-to-volatile ordering)
The canonical reference is conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md §1 (the full 12-layer table with the stable/volatile classification + the byte-comparison test contract + the per-layer ─── data markings). This section is a pointer.
The one-line summary: layers 1-7 (role instructions, function-calling schema, tool descriptions, system prompt, persona, project context, knowledge digest) are byte-identical across turns and cacheable. Layers 8-12 (discussion metadata, active preset, per-file details, prior tool results, user message) are per-turn and NOT cached. The cache boundary is at layer 7/8.
2. The byte-comparison test (the design contract)
The design rule "stable prefix is byte-identical" must be testable. The test:
# In tests/test_aggregate_caching.py (NEW)
def test_aggregate_stable_to_volatile_ordering():
"""The first N characters of the context should be identical across turns
of the same conversation, when no stable-layer inputs change."""
ctrl = mock_app_controller()
ctrl.ai_settings.system_prompt = "Test system prompt"
ctrl.active_persona = mock_persona()
# Turn 1
turn1 = aggregate.build_initial_context(ctrl, user_message="first prompt")
# Turn 2 (same stable inputs, different user message)
turn2 = aggregate.build_initial_context(ctrl, user_message="second prompt")
# The first N characters should be identical (N = where the volatile layers start)
N = aggregate.stable_prefix_length(ctrl)
assert turn1[:N] == turn2[:N], f"Stable prefix mismatch: {turn1[:N]!r} != {turn2[:N]!r}"
The test is the contract. If a new layer is added in the middle of the stack, this test fails; the agent must either move the layer to the stable position or update the test (with written justification).
3. The provider-specific cache strategies
3.1 Anthropic (5-minute ephemeral, 4 breakpoints max)
# In src/ai_client.py:_send_anthropic
def _send_anthropic(messages, *, cache_prefix_chars=None):
if cache_prefix_chars is not None:
# Wrap the message in content blocks; mark each prefix with cache_control
content_blocks = cache_prefix_blocks(messages, cache_prefix_chars)
else:
content_blocks = messages
response = anthropic_client.messages.create(
model=model,
max_tokens=8192,
messages=[{"role": "user", "content": content_blocks}],
)
return _result_with_usage(response.content, response.usage, messages)
The cache_prefix_blocks helper:
def cache_prefix_blocks(message: str, cache_boundaries: list[int]) -> list[dict]:
"""Split the message into content blocks at the given char offsets.
Mark each prefix block with cache_control. Returns the plain string
when no valid boundary exists. At most 3 prefix blocks (provider limit
is 4 breakpoints per request)."""
if not cache_boundaries:
return message
points = sorted({b for b in cache_boundaries if 0 < b < len(message)})[:3]
if not points:
return message
blocks = []
start = 0
for point in points:
blocks.append({
"type": "text",
"text": message[start:point],
"cache_control": {"type": "ephemeral"},
})
start = point
blocks.append({"type": "text", "text": message[start:]})
return blocks
The Anthropic usage accounting:
def _result_with_usage(text, usage, input_text=None):
input_tokens = _usage_value(usage, "input_tokens", "prompt_tokens", "prompt_token_count")
# Anthropic reports cached prompt tokens separately; fold them back
# so input_tokens stays "tokens sent" across providers.
input_tokens += _usage_value(usage, "cache_read_input_tokens")
input_tokens += _usage_value(usage, "cache_creation_input_tokens")
# ...
The 4-breakpoint limit. Anthropic allows at most 4 cache_control markers per request. Manual Slop uses 3 prefix blocks (one breakpoint per prefix) + 1 volatile suffix.
3.2 Gemini (1-hour explicit cache, configurable TTL)
# In src/ai_client.py:_send_gemini
def _send_gemini(messages, *, cache_ttl_seconds=3600):
if cache_ttl_seconds > 0:
cached_content = genai_client.caches.create(
model=model,
contents=stable_prefix_messages,
ttl=f"{cache_ttl_seconds}s",
)
response = genai_client.models.generate_content(
model=model,
contents=volatile_messages,
config=genai.types.GenerateContentConfig(cached_content=cached_content.name),
)
else:
response = genai_client.models.generate_content(model=model, contents=messages)
return _result_with_usage(response.text, response.usage_metadata, messages)
The default TTL is 1 hour. Configurable per the GUI (per §4 below).
3.3 OpenAI (5-10 min implicit, provider-managed)
OpenAI's caching is implicit: the provider automatically caches the prefix and reuses it across requests with the same prefix. No application-side control.
# In src/ai_client.py:_send_openai
def _send_openai(messages, *, model="gpt-5.5"):
response = openai_client.responses.create(model=model, input=messages)
return _result_with_usage(response.output_text, response.usage, messages)
# No application-side cache_control; the provider handles it
The TTL is provider-managed (5-10 min). The GUI just shows "Cached by OpenAI; TTL: provider-managed."
3.4 claude-code (5th provider, subscription auth)
claude-code uses the Claude Agent SDK with local Claude Code authentication (no API key). The caching behavior is provider-managed.
# In src/ai_client.py:_send_claude_code (the 5th provider)
def _send_claude_code(message, model, *, allowed_tools=None, max_turns=1):
options = ClaudeAgentOptions(
model=None if not model or model == "default" else model,
max_turns=max_turns,
tools=list(allowed_tools) if allowed_tools else [],
allowed_tools=list(allowed_tools) if allowed_tools else [],
cwd=os.getcwd(),
)
# ... claude_agent_sdk.query(prompt=message, options=options)
return _result_with_usage(text, usage, message)
4. The GUI exposure
The "Caching" Operations Hub sub-panel:
+------------------------------------------------------+
| Caching |
+------------------------------------------------------+
| Provider summaries |
| [Anthropic] in:340 cache:80 hit:23% ttl:4:32 |
| [Gemini] in:120 cache:0 hit:0% ttl:0:00 |
| [OpenAI] in:560 cache:200 hit:35% ttl:n/a |
+------------------------------------------------------+
| Active discussions |
| Discussion "refactor auth" |
| cached: yes (Anthropic) |
| expires: 2026-06-12T15:32 (in 4:32) |
| [Invalidate cache] [Disable caching for this] |
| Discussion "fix the parser" |
| cached: no |
| [Enable caching for this] |
+------------------------------------------------------+
| Global settings |
| [X] Enable Anthropic ephemeral caching |
| [X] Enable Gemini explicit caching |
| [ ] Allow >1h Gemini caches (charges may apply) |
| Anthropic default TTL: [5 min v] |
| Gemini default TTL: [60 min v] |
+------------------------------------------------------+
The data sources:
| Widget | Data source | Frequency |
|---|---|---|
in:N cache:N hit:N% |
ai_client.get_token_stats() |
per turn (or per session) |
ttl:4:32 |
ai_client._send_<provider> usage metadata + the cache expiry timestamp |
per turn |
cached: yes/no |
per-discussion flag (NEW) | per discussion |
[Invalidate cache] |
calls ai_client._invalidate_cache(discussion_id) (NEW) |
on click |
The new AI client state:
# In src/ai_client.py (NEW)
@dataclass
class DiscussionCacheState:
discussion_id: str
provider: str
cached_at: datetime
expires_at: Optional[datetime]
hit_count: int = 0
tokens_cached: int = 0
last_invalidated_at: Optional[datetime] = None
caching_enabled: bool = True
# In AppController (NEW)
self.discussion_caches: dict[str, DiscussionCacheState] = {}
The Hook API additions:
GET /api/cache # list all discussion cache states
GET /api/cache/<discussion_id> # get one
POST /api/cache/<discussion_id>/invalidate
POST /api/cache/<discussion_id>/disable
POST /api/cache/<discussion_id>/enable
5. The injection (where the cache hits)
| Layer | Where injected | Stable? | Cache impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1. Role instructions | _get_combined_system_prompt |
yes | CACHED |
| 2. Function-calling schema | per provider | yes | CACHED |
| 3. Discovered tool descriptions | mcp_client.get_tool_schemas() |
yes | CACHED |
| 4. System prompt preset | app_state.ai_settings.system_prompt |
yes | CACHED |
| 5. Persona profile | app_state.active_persona |
yes | CACHED |
| 6. Project context | manual_slop.toml [agent.context_files] |
yes | CACHED |
| 7. Knowledge digest | ~/.manual_slop/knowledge/digest.md |
yes (within a gc cycle) | CACHED |
| 8. Discussion metadata | disc_entries[:1] |
no | NOT cached |
| 9. Active preset | self.context_files |
no | NOT cached |
| 10. Per-file details | per FileItem |
no | NOT cached |
| 11. Prior tool results | per _reread_file_items |
no | NOT cached |
| 12. User message | the input | no | NOT cached |
The cache only hits on the stable prefix (layers 1-7). The volatile suffix (layers 8-12) is not cached; the user expects the conversation to change per turn.
6. The cache invalidation triggers
| Trigger | Effect |
|---|---|
python -m src.knowledge_harvest --apply |
The digest is regenerated; the cache is invalidated for the next turn |
FileItem.notes edited |
The per-file knowledge changes; the cache is invalidated for the next turn that references the file |
persona changed |
The persona profile is in the stable prefix; the cache is invalidated |
[Invalidate cache] button |
The per-discussion cache state is marked last_invalidated_at; the next turn re-creates it |
expiration reached |
The provider's cache expires automatically; the next turn re-creates it |
7. The measurement (the empirical basis)
The "before" measurement (do this first, before any refactor):
# Log the cache hit rate over a sample of representative discussions
$ python -m scripts.measure_cache_hit_rate --discussions 50 --provider anthropic
cache hit rate: 23% (avg)
cache write rate: 45% (avg)
in:N avg: 1,200
cache:N avg: 280
The "after" measurement (after the stable-to-volatile refactor):
$ python -m scripts.measure_cache_hit_rate --discussions 50 --provider anthropic
cache hit rate: 67% (avg) # <-- should be measurably higher
cache write rate: 18% (avg) # <-- should be lower
in:N avg: 1,200 # <-- unchanged (the user still types the same)
cache:N avg: 280 # <-- unchanged
The win comes from re-aligning the boundaries, not from changing the providers. The test is whether the cache hit rate is measurably higher after the refactor.
8. The cross-references
conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md— the canonical styleguidedocs/guide_ai_client.md— the underlying LLM client (the producer)docs/guide_agent_memory_dimensions.md§5 — where the 4 dims get injecteddocs/guide_knowledge_curation.md§3 — the digest (layer 7)conductor/tracks/nagent_review_20260608/nagent_review_v2_3_20260612.md§3.2, §5 — the nagent pattern