Per user 'a bunch of docs just committed had redundant content across files. Can we do a reduction of that and instead map references to other files?' This commit reduces content duplication across 9 files. The canonical sources are kept as detailed references; the other files now point to them. Reductions (table replaced with 'see canonical' reference): 1. data_oriented_design.md §9: the 4-dim memory table (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0) 2. guide_agent_memory_dimensions.md §0: the 4-dim memory table (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0) 3. guide_caching_strategy.md §1: the 12-layer model (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md §1) 4. guide_ai_client.md 'Cache strategy' section: the 12-layer model recap (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md §1) 5. guide_knowledge_curation.md §1: the 5 category file details (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/knowledge_artifacts.md §1) 6. product-guidelines.md 'Memory Dimensions' section: the 4-dim table (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0) 7. guide_mma.md '4 memory dimensions' section: the MMA scope table (canonical: conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0) 8. docs/AGENTS.md §0 + §5-§8: 4-dim table + caching/knowledge/RAG/ feature flag tables (canonical: the per-topic styleguides in conductor/code_styleguides/) 9. AGENTS.md 'Code Styleguides' section: the 6-styleguide list (canonical: docs/AGENTS.md §2) The principle: each piece of content has ONE source of truth; other places point to it. The data-oriented way. Files retain their narrative flow and the 'what this is' intros, but the detailed tables are now in their canonical home. Net effect: -2100 bytes across 9 files (without losing any information - the canonical sources are unchanged). The 'cross-references' sections are kept; the duplicated content is removed.
13 KiB
./docs/AGENTS.md (the agent-facing mirror)
Status: Agent-facing mirror of docs/Readme.md (the human-facing docs index, which is preserved as-is). For agents (any tier), this is the recommended first read for understanding the project's docs structure.
Date: 2026-06-12
Cross-refs: docs/Readme.md (human-facing); AGENTS.md (project root); the 6 styleguides in conductor/code_styleguides/.
What this is.
docs/Readme.mdis the human-facing docs index. This file is the agent-facing equivalent: it organizes the 14 deep-dive guides underdocs/by MMA tier, and it cross-references the canonical styleguides. The 2 files cover the same docs but with different audiences and different reading paths.The reading path. If you're an agent scoping a feature, read this file first; then read the 1-2
guide_*.mdfiles for the layers your feature touches; then read the 1-2 styleguides for the patterns the feature uses. The expected reading time for a typical feature: 10-15 minutes.
0. The 4 memory dimensions (the cross-cutting lens)
The conversation data has 4 distinct memory dimensions (curation / discussion / RAG / knowledge). Most features touch 1-2; some touch 3. Use this lens to identify which dimension(s) your feature needs.
The full canonical 4-dim table is in conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md §0 (with the SSDL shape tag per dim). The cross-cutting guide is docs/guide_agent_memory_dimensions.md.
The one-line summary: curation is per-file structural; discussion is per-turn conversational; RAG is opt-in semantic; knowledge is per-project durable. Pick the matching dimension; don't reach for the wrong shape.
1. The 14 deep-dive guides (organized by MMA tier)
| Tier | Guide | What it covers | When to read |
|---|---|---|---|
| T1 | docs/guide_architecture.md |
Threading model; cross-thread state sync | When scoping any cross-cutting feature |
| T1 | docs/guide_meta_boundary.md |
The Application vs Meta-Tooling split | When scoping a Meta-Tooling-side feature |
| T2 | docs/guide_app_controller.md |
The headless controller; AppState dataclass |
When implementing controller-side logic |
| T2 | docs/guide_ai_client.md |
The multi-provider LLM client | When implementing LLM-side logic |
| T2 | docs/guide_mma.md |
The 4-tier MMA orchestration | When implementing MMA-side logic |
| T2 | docs/guide_tools.md |
The MCP tool inventory + Hook API | When implementing MCP tools or Hook endpoints |
| T2 | docs/guide_mcp_client.md |
The 45 tools + 3-layer security | When implementing new MCP tools or sub-MCPs |
| T3 | docs/guide_context_curation.md |
Granular AST Control + Fuzzy Anchors + Structural File Editor | When implementing curation-side features |
| T3 | docs/guide_personas.md |
The unified agent profile model | When implementing persona-side features |
| T3 | docs/guide_rag.md |
The RAG subsystem | When implementing RAG-side features (rare; opt-in) |
| T3 | docs/guide_gui_2.md |
The ImGui application | When implementing GUI-side features |
| All | docs/guide_testing.md |
The test suite architecture (251 test files; 7 conftest fixtures) | When writing any test |
| All | docs/guide_command_palette.md |
The 33 commands + "Everything" mode | When implementing command-palette features |
| NEW | docs/guide_knowledge_curation.md |
The knowledge memory guide (4th dim) | When implementing knowledge-side features |
| NEW | docs/guide_caching_strategy.md |
Caching across providers; stable-to-volatile ordering; cache TTL GUI | When implementing cache-side features |
| NEW | docs/guide_agent_memory_dimensions.md |
Cross-cutting: the 4 memory dimensions | When scoping any feature that touches memory |
2. The 6 canonical styleguides (the convention catalog)
| Styleguide | What it codifies | When to read |
|---|---|---|
conductor/code_styleguides/data_oriented_design.md |
The canonical DOD reference (Tier 0/1/2; 3 defaults to reject; 7-question simplification pass; 10-question self-check) | Before any non-trivial work |
conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md |
The 4 memory dimensions and when to use each | When the feature touches memory |
conductor/code_styleguides/rag_integration_discipline.md |
The conservative-RAG rule (opt-in; complements; provenance; no mutation; feature-gated; graceful failure) | When the feature uses RAG |
conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md |
Stable-to-volatile context ordering; the cache TTL GUI contract; the byte-comparison test | When the feature builds context or caches |
conductor/code_styleguides/knowledge_artifacts.md |
The knowledge harvest pattern (category files, provenance, sha256 ledger, digest regeneration) | When the feature uses the knowledge dim |
conductor/code_styleguides/feature_flags.md |
File presence ("delete to turn off") vs config flags vs CLI flags; when to use each | When adding a new feature toggle |
3. The per-tier reading path
Tier 1 (Orchestrator) — what to read
For scoping a feature, understanding the architecture, and planning:
| Read | Why |
|---|---|
docs/guide_architecture.md |
The threading model; the cross-thread data flow |
docs/guide_meta_boundary.md |
The Application vs Meta-Tooling split (load-bearing) |
docs/guide_agent_memory_dimensions.md |
The 4 memory dimensions (which dim does my feature touch?) |
conductor/code_styleguides/data_oriented_design.md |
The 3 defaults to reject; the simplification pass; the final self-check |
AGENTS.md (project root) |
The project-root agent-facing rules |
This file (.docs/AGENTS.md) |
The docs structure |
Tier 1 does NOT typically read: guide_*.md for the specific subsystems (T2 reads those).
Tier 2 (Tech Lead) — what to read
For track design, ticket generation, and architecture:
| Read | Why |
|---|---|
| All of Tier 1's reads | (foundational) |
docs/guide_app_controller.md |
The headless controller; the _predefined_callbacks and _gettable_fields registries |
docs/guide_ai_client.md |
The LLM client; the providers; the cache strategy |
docs/guide_mma.md |
The 4-tier MMA; the DAG engine; the worker pool |
docs/guide_tools.md |
The MCP tool inventory; the Hook API; the 3-layer security |
conductor/code_styleguides/agent_memory_dimensions.md |
(for memory-touching tracks) |
conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md |
(for context-building tracks) |
Tier 2 does NOT typically read: guide_context_curation.md, guide_personas.md, guide_rag.md, guide_gui_2.md (T3 reads those).
Tier 3 (Worker) — what to read
For surgical implementation:
| Read | Why |
|---|---|
| All of Tier 2's reads (selectively) | (the system context) |
The 1-2 guide_*.md files for the specific layers the ticket touches |
(the implementation surface) |
The 1-2 code_styleguides/...md files for the patterns the ticket uses |
(the convention) |
The ticket itself (conductor/tracks/<id>/plan.md) |
(the specific task) |
Tier 3 reads in depth, not in breadth. A typical T3 worker reads 2-4 docs total.
Tier 4 (QA) — what to read
For error analysis and bug reproduction:
| Read | Why |
|---|---|
| All of Tier 2's reads (selectively) | (the system context) |
The 1-2 guide_*.md files for the failing layer |
(the reproduction surface) |
| The test file (if any) | (the verification surface) |
The audit scripts (scripts/audit_*.py) |
(the static analysis surface) |
Tier 4 reads narrowly. The bug is in 1-2 files; the read is in 1-2 docs.
4. The 4 memory dimensions (the cross-cutting lens, in detail)
Most features touch 1-2 dimensions. Use this decision tree:
Q: What is the *data* the feature needs?
│
├── "How to render a file" ──► Curation (FileItem)
├── "What was said in this chat" ──► Discussion (disc_entries)
├── "What similar content exists" ──► RAG (RAGEngine.search) [opt-in]
└── "What we learned from past runs" ──► Knowledge (knowledge/digest.md)
Pick the matching dimension. If the feature needs 2+, use 2+ — but be explicit about which is primary and which is secondary.
The wrong shape for the right question is a common mistake:
- "Where does X happen?" → RAG (semantic search)
- "How do I configure how file Y is rendered?" → Curation (FileItem)
- "What was the user asking about 3 turns ago?" → Discussion (disc_entries)
- "What did we decide last time about Z?" → Knowledge (digest)
See docs/guide_agent_memory_dimensions.md for the full cross-cutting guide.
5. The caching strategy (the cross-cutting concern)
If the feature builds the initial context (in aggregate.py:run) or calls the LLM (in ai_client.py:send), the cache strategy matters.
The 12-layer model: the full table is in conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md §1. The short version: layers 1-7 (role, schema, tools, system prompt, persona, project context, knowledge digest) are byte-identical across turns and cacheable; layers 8-12 (discussion metadata, active preset, per-file details, prior tool results, user message) are per-turn and NOT cached. Cache boundary is at layer 7/8.
The byte-comparison test (the design contract for the stable prefix): the test in tests/test_aggregate_caching.py ensures the first N characters of the context are identical across turns. The implementation is aggregate.stable_prefix_length(ctrl) -> N. See conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md §2.
The provider-specific TTLs:
| Provider | Default TTL | Configurable? |
|---|---|---|
| Anthropic ephemeral | 5 min | yes (per-provider control surface) |
| Gemini explicit | 1 h | yes (per-discussion override) |
| OpenAI implicit | 5-10 min (provider-managed) | no |
The GUI exposure is a "Caching" Operations Hub sub-panel. See docs/guide_caching_strategy.md for the full guide and conductor/code_styleguides/cache_friendly_context.md for the styleguide.
6. The knowledge harvest (the durable layer)
The 4th memory dimension (knowledge) is opt-in but encouraged — it's the durable, user-editable, provenance-aware store.
The canonical reference is conductor/code_styleguides/knowledge_artifacts.md §0-§4 (the directory layout + the 5 category files + the digest + the ledger + the harvest workflow). The user-facing guide is docs/guide_knowledge_curation.md.
The one-line summary: the user can rm ~/.manual_slop/knowledge/digest.md to turn off the knowledge injection (file presence as the feature flag). Re-enable by running python -m src.knowledge_harvest --apply. The LLM output is strict JSON with 7 categories; the retry budget is 2 attempts.
7. The RAG discipline (the opt-in fuzzy dimension)
RAG is the fuzzy semantic search dimension. It's opt-in (default-off in new projects).
The canonical reference is conductor/code_styleguides/rag_integration_discipline.md (the 6 rules: opt-in, complement, provenance, no mutation, feature-gated, graceful failure). The user-facing guide is docs/guide_rag.md.
8. The feature flag patterns (when to use what)
When adding a new feature with an "on/off" toggle, choose the right pattern.
The canonical reference is conductor/code_styleguides/feature_flags.md (file presence vs config flag vs CLI flag vs track metadata flag; the decision tree; the forbidden patterns). The short version:
- File presence ("delete to turn off") — the feature produces a side artifact; the user might want to clean up by
rm-ing it (e.g.,~/.manual_slop/knowledge/digest.md) - Config flag — the feature is always on; the flag is a persistent preference (e.g.,
[ai_settings.toml] rag.enabled) | CLI flag | The feature is invoked from the CLI; the flag is a one-shot override |python -m src.knowledge_harvest --apply| | Track metadata flag | The track's implementation uses a feature; this is static documentation |metadata.json:{"uses_rag": true}|
See conductor/code_styleguides/feature_flags.md for the full guide.
9. The cross-cutting principles (the data-oriented foundation)
All 14 docs and 6 styleguides share the same foundation (per data_oriented_design.md):
- The data is the thing. The conversation, the file items, the knowledge digest — these are the source of truth
- Behavior is transformation over data. Not object graphs; not hidden state; not opaque handles
- Avoid hidden mutable state. Errors are data, not exceptions. State is on disk, not in memory
- Separate durable artifacts from temporary execution. Workers are disposable; artifacts are durable
- Optimize the shape, availability, and maintenance of the data. Editable, provenance-aware, user-editable
When in doubt, read conductor/code_styleguides/data_oriented_design.md first.
10. The reading path (the 1-page summary)
For an agent scoping a feature:
- Read this file (10 min)
- Read the 1-2
guide_*.mdfor the layers your feature touches (5-10 min each) - Read the 1-2
code_styleguides/...mdfor the patterns your feature uses (5-10 min each) - Read the ticket (
conductor/tracks/<id>/plan.md) for the specific task (variable)
Total: 20-45 min for a typical feature. The investment pays back across the feature's lifetime.
If a guide is missing or stale, that's a bug; file a docs issue (or update the guide inline, per the project's "edit the source of truth, not this file" pattern).
End of agent-facing mirror.