Private
Public Access
0
0
Commit Graph

2 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
ed ea4d3781a6 docs: fix 4 stale refs (4-thread->8, dispatch line 1341->1322, 7->11 locks)
Caught these when re-verifying the 4 commits from docs_sync_test_era_20260610.
Not in my track originally (per the prior 'no track boundary' correction),
but they're stale data and easy to fix in one commit:

- docs/Readme.md:41: '4-thread ... 7 lock-protected regions' -> '8-thread
  io_pool ... 11 lock-protected regions' (bumped 4->8 in 4a338486
  on 2026-06-06; 11 locks counted in __init__ at app_controller.py:778-1212)

- docs/reports/session_synthesis_20260608.md:121: same fix, plus a
  note that this report predates the bump

- docs/reports/workflow_markdown_audit_20260608.md:40: same fix
  (the audit report was correct AT TIME OF WRITE but is now stale)

- docs/guide_tools.md:57: 'mcp_client.py:1341' -> 'mcp_client.py:1322'
  (the dispatch function's actual line)

Left unchanged:
- docs/reports/COMPACTION_DIGEST_20260607.md:45 mentions '4 workers are
  stuck' in a specific historical context (2026-06-07 hang investigation
  pre-bump). That '4' was true at the time and is part of the historical
  record; flagging in commit message not text.
2026-06-10 21:25:56 -04:00
conductor-tier2 77d7dff5ff docs(session-synthesis): preserve-before-compact archive of the 2026-06-08 session
The user explicitly requested the biggest in-depth report I can
muster at 478,992 tokens (94% of context window). The next
session will start with a fresh context; these two documents are
the minimum-sufficient anchor.

docs/reports/session_synthesis_20260608.md (579 lines, 40KB):
- 12 sections covering every artifact this session produced
- The 5 sources loaded: 2 YouTube transcripts + 2 Fleury
  articles + user's chunk-ideation archive
- The 10 commits in the session's commit chain (with the
  user's test-fragility work adjacent but not mine)
- The 4 audit-time heuristics derived from the 5-source lens
- The "what the user should know" section for next session

docs/reports/proposed_new_tracks_20260608.md (190 lines, 12KB):
- 2 new tracks proposed (manual_ux_validation_20260608_PLACEHOLDER,
  chunkification_optimization_20260608_PLACEHOLDER) with
  spec-ready detail
- 8 non-recommendations (so the user knows what I'm NOT
  suggesting)
- A "what I'd recommend" section with one-tracks-when
  sequencing

No code modified. Both are session-final artifacts, not tracks.
They live in docs/reports/ alongside the other session outputs
(SSDL digest, ASCII-sketch workflow, chunk ideation archive).

Cross-references the 5 sources (all committed to docs/transcripts/
and docs/ideation/ in earlier user commits):

- docs/transcripts/wo84LFzx5nI_big_oops_casemuratori.txt
- docs/transcripts/i-h95QIGchY_assuming_as_much_as_possible_andrewreece.txt
- docs/ideation/ed_chunk_data_structures_20260523.md
- docs/reports/computational_shapes_ssdl_digest_20260608.md
- docs/reports/ascii_sketch_ux_workflow_20260608.md

These 5 documents are the session's "thinking-aid" corpus. The
synthesis is the *index*; together they're the minimum-sufficient
context to re-anchor any future session.
2026-06-08 22:25:00 -04:00