5 sections. ~80 LOC. PRIMARY (user's own project): 4 forth bootslop attempt_1 files (duffle.amd64.win32.h, main.c, microui.c, microui.h). Documents how the user applies duffle conventions in their own project; includes the microui library integration (MU_* prefix style).
3 sections. ~50 LOC. PRIMARY (forth references): 2 files (jombloforth.asm, jombloforth.f). Documents forth-specific style and the C-like idioms that translate to C11 (the user's own forth conventions inform the C11 style).
Both state.toml files updated to status = 'completed':
- video_analysis_deob_apply_20260621/state.toml: Pass 2 SHIPPED; 35 atomic commits; 14,413 LOC across 33 deliverables; 4 + 3 verification criteria met; 12 refinements + 8 gaps documented; user approved 2026-06-23 ('ok awesome')
- video_analysis_deob_lexicon_v2_20260623/state.toml: v2 corrective pass SHIPPED; 7 atomic commits; 17 v1->v2 changes applied; user approved 2026-06-23 ('ok awesome')
Pass 2 is COMPLETE. Pass 3 (C11/Python projection) is unblocked. The 6 open questions for Pass 3 are answered:
- Applied domain = C11 (raddbg/duffel/pikuma/forth bootslop) or Python (manual_slop)
- User-specific forms = annotation if not code; pseudo sectr lang needs adapting in code
- Indefinites use placeholder scheme (float/integer/Scalar); float64 only when target resolution matters
- Template notation B as default; C++/Odin/Jai opt-in; per-language << >> renderings documented
- Criteria are OK
- Pass 3 = markdown docs + code files (may or may not run)
Awaiting user's scoping decision for Pass 3.
3 principled maps reshaped per v2 corrections.
Map 1 (Curry-Howard): proof/construction distinction preserved; construction is a sub-type tag, not a replacement (per user 2026-06-23).
Map 2 (Types=Kinds, v2): Removed the 'Sets' leg (set is a data structure, not an enumerable type). Documented that 'kind' (lowercase) is reserved for enumeration types: components, DAG nodes, fat structs. Type/Genus/Kind are analogous (per user 2026-06-23).
Map 3 (Procedures=Words, v2): Removed the 'Functions' leg. function (declarative/math) and procedure (imperative/CS) are distinct concepts (per user 2026-06-23).
Maps 4, 5, 6 unchanged.
The pilot (Phase 2) is shipped; Phase 3 is now unblocked and ready for Tier 2 dispatch.
5 new files in video_analysis_deob_apply_20260621/:
- spec.md: updated to reference the new files (lightweight scaffold)
- plan.md: 6-phase pipeline (init → read → apply A cluster → apply B cluster → apply C cluster → apply E+D+synthesis → final report + verify) with 25 tasks
- metadata.json: scope, 14 verification criteria, 5-item risk register, 10 user directives
- state.toml: 6 phases + 25 tasks + 10 verification flags + 11 user-directives-logged entries
- TIER2_STARTER.md: dispatch prompt with file-read order, the 2 user refinements (decompress names + operator reference), the 3 pilot process improvements, the 8 refinements + 5 gaps to apply, the 11 inputs (10 videos + 1 synthesis), when-stuck guide, copy-paste-ready block
CRITICAL context for Tier 2 (the 2 user refinements + 3 pilot improvements):
1. **Decompress names AND expressions** (per 2026-06-23): use DESCRIPTIVE names, NOT single letters. Multi-line constructions preferred.
2. **Use the operator reference** (report.md §9): 13 categories of operators with behavior + type signatures. The LLM should consult this when applying the de-obfuscation.
3. **3-column translation tables** (pilot improvement #1)
4. **Tier-categorized decoders** (pilot improvement #2)
5. **Split apply_report.md** into 3 sections (pilot improvement #3)
The 11 inputs: 10 remaining Pass 1 reports + 1 cross-cutting synthesis. Produces 34 deliverables (33 per-video 3-layer files + 1 apply report). This is the FINAL phase of Pass 2 — the result feeds Pass 3 (projection to applied domain, future, user-led).
Per user 2026-06-23 feedback on the pilot output:
1. **Decompress names AND expressions** (in prompt_template.md 'Your role'):
- Name-bound terms should be DESCRIPTIVE, not single letters, unless the single letter is universally obvious (e.g., x for input, f for function)
- Examples: p(X₁, ..., X_L) → language_model(sequence : Token^L) -> Probability : float64
W · h + b → output_projection = weight_matrix.matmul(hidden_state) + bias_vector
H(X) → entropy(distribution : Probability_Distribution) -> Entropy : float64
K(X) → kolmogorov_complexity(object : Object) -> Complexity : int64
- The LLM should NOT be afraid to translate expressions to multi-line definitions or build them up as constructions
2. **§9 Operator reference (indexed)** in report.md (new section):
- 13 categories covering every operator the de-obfuscation uses in practice:
arithmetic, comparison, logical, set-theoretic, type-theoretic, constructors, data-oriented, pipeline, sectors, type-class resolution, process, procedural/functional, why-this-exists
- Each operator: symbol, name, behavior, type signature, example
- Comprehensive expansion of the warmup's §3.3 14-primitive grammar
- The LLM is expected to use this as a reference when applying the de-obfuscation
3. The 'while' operator is explicitly BANNED (per Rule 1) — use 'for', 'iterate', or 'Stream' instead.
These 2 refinements will be propagated forward:
- prompt_template.md 'Your role' updated (the LLM's direct operating stance)
- The §9 operator reference added to report.md (the warmup's design doc; the lexicon's source)
- Phase 3 (apply) TIER2_STARTER will reference both