nagent: add v2.2 review (style + intent DSL survey cross-refs)

v2.2 (nagent_review_v2_2_20260612.md, ~35KB) is a focused delta, not a full
rewrite. Two user inputs drove it:

1. The user published intent_dsl_survey_20260612/report_v1.2.md (1367 lines,
   10 prior-art clusters, 4 anchor claims, ~42-verb vocab, 10 AI-Agent
   Properties in §6). The survey's §6 Claims 4 and 5 explicitly cite
   nagent_review_v2_1 §2.1 and §2.2 as the source for the 4 memory
   dimensions and stable-to-volatile cache ordering — so the v2.1 patterns
   are now formally codified by the survey.

2. The user said: 'I don't really like JSON, I like table based formats
   more, or things that are forth/array-like.'

v2.2 applies the data-format preferences:
- JSON block in v2.1 §2.1 (harvest output schema) replaced with a §4.4
  7-column table (Symbol, Name, Signature, Semantics, Example,
  Borrowed from, Shape)
- Comparison table (§5) reformatted with SSDL shape tags
- Future-track candidate list (§6) reformatted as a single 16-row table
  with all metadata columns
- Proposed new artifacts (§8) in table form

v2.2 adopts survey grammar primitives (name := value, for x .. n,
if cond { ... }, tape { ... }, try { ... } recover err { ... },
sandbox { ... }, audit msg, fuzzy { ... }) where applicable.

v2.2 adds:
- Candidate 12b (cache TTL GUI controls) - the v2.1 sub-candidate
- Candidate 16 (AGENTS.md @import + canonical DOD file) - HIGH priority,
  the foundation for all the other styleguides
- New §11 'In dialogue with intent DSL survey' - the 9 mutual cross-refs

v2 and v2.1 are preserved (per user instruction). All v1 artifacts and
the human Readme files are preserved. Format commitment for the
next-turn artifacts: all new styleguides and project docs will follow
the §4.4 table format.

conductor/tracks/nagent_review_20260608/state.toml

@@ -77,6 +77,30 @@ t_v2_1_review_pending_06 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description =
 t_v2_1_review_pending_07 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Update existing workflow docs (conductor/workflow.md, conductor/product-guidelines.md, docs/guide_mma.md, docs/guide_ai_client.md) with v2.1 patterns" }
 t_v2_1_review_pending_08 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Verify Candidate 15 (save-with-graceful-summary-failure) by reading src/ai_client.py:run_discussion_compression" }
 
+# v2.2 review (2026-06-12, third iteration): user finished intent_dsl_survey_20260612 report_v1.2;
+# v2.1 was the seed for survey §6 Claims 4 and 5; v2.2 applies the new style preferences (tables,
+# SSDL tags, no JSON) and explicitly cross-references the survey
+# v2 and v2.1 are PRESERVED; v2.2 is non-destructive new file
+t_v2_2_review_01 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: read intent_dsl_survey_20260612/report_v1.2.md §1, §3, §4, §5, §6, §7 (~600 lines; 10 prior-art clusters, 4 anchor claims, ~42-verb vocab, 10 AI-Agent Properties)" }
+t_v2_2_review_02 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: applied the user's data-format preferences (table-based, forth/array-like, no JSON) — JSON blocks in v2.1 §2.1 replaced with §4.4 7-column tables (Symbol, Name, Signature, Semantics, Example, Borrowed from, Shape)" }
+t_v2_2_review_03 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: adopted SSDL shape tags ([I], ===>, o==>, [B], [M], [N], [Q], [S], ───) for the comparison table and future-track candidate list" }
+t_v2_2_review_04 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: cross-referenced the intent DSL survey's 10 AI-Agent Properties (§6 Claims 1-10) — Claims 4 and 5 explicitly cite v2.1 §2.1 and §2.2 as their source" }
+t_v2_2_review_05 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: applied the survey's grammar primitives (name := value, for x .. n, if cond { ... }, tape { ... }, try { ... } recover err { ... }, sandbox { ... }, audit msg, fuzzy { ... }) where applicable" }
+t_v2_2_review_06 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: added new §11 'In dialogue with intent DSL survey' — the 9 mutual cross-references and the 3 the user should know about" }
+t_v2_2_review_07 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: reformatted §3 future-track candidates as a single 16-row table with all metadata columns (Symbol, Name, Domain, Priority, Effort, Shape, Depends on, Cross-refs)" }
+t_v2_2_review_08 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: added Candidate 12b (cache TTL GUI controls) and Candidate 16 (AGENTS.md @import + canonical DOD file) to the table; re-ranked priorities" }
+t_v2_2_review_09 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: wrote nagent_review_v2_2_20260612.md (new file, ~35KB) — focused delta, not a full rewrite; v2 and v2.1 are preserved" }
+t_v2_2_review_10 = { status = "completed", commit_sha = "", description = "v2.2: format commitment for the upcoming next-turn artifacts — all new styleguides and project docs will follow the §4.4 table format" }
+
+# v2.2 pending (for the next turn)
+t_v2_2_review_pending_01 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "User review of v2.2 + confirmation of which new artifacts to create in the next turn" }
+t_v2_2_review_pending_02 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Create canonical DOD file at conductor/code_styleguides/data_oriented_design.md (in §4.4 table format)" }
+t_v2_2_review_pending_03 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Update AGENTS.md to add @conductor/code_styleguides/data_oriented_design.md import (in §4.4 table format)" }
+t_v2_2_review_pending_04 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Create ./docs/AGENTS.md as agent-facing mirror of docs/Readme.md (in §4.4 table format)" }
+t_v2_2_review_pending_05 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Write 5 new styleguides in §4.4 table format (agent_memory_dimensions.md, rag_integration_discipline.md, cache_friendly_context.md, knowledge_artifacts.md, feature_flags.md)" }
+t_v2_2_review_pending_06 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Write 3 new project docs in §4.4 table format (guide_knowledge_curation.md, guide_caching_strategy.md, guide_agent_memory_dimensions.md)" }
+t_v2_2_review_pending_07 = { status = "pending", commit_sha = "", description = "Update existing workflow docs (conductor/workflow.md, conductor/product-guidelines.md, docs/guide_mma.md, docs/guide_ai_client.md) using survey grammar primitives and §4.4 table format" }
+
 [user_wants_recorded]
 # User explicitly wants these in priority order (see decisions.md for full detail)
 want_1_sub_conversation_runner = "EXPLICIT: 'I probably want to add that for just 1:1 discussions where I use a sub-agent manually for specific points'"