Private
Public Access
conductor(platonic_intelligence_kumar): Phase 5 Verification - end-of-track report + state.toml completed
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,92 @@
|
||||
# Track Completion: video_analysis_platonic_intelligence_kumar_20260621
|
||||
|
||||
**Track:** `video_analysis_platonic_intelligence_kumar_20260621`
|
||||
**Type:** Per-child research track (Pass 1 of 3) — child #5 of 12 in `video_analysis_campaign_20260621`
|
||||
**Status:** SHIPPED
|
||||
**Tier:** 2 Tech Lead (per-child dispatch)
|
||||
**Ship date:** 2026-06-21
|
||||
|
||||
## Summary
|
||||
|
||||
Fifth child of the video_analysis_campaign_20260621 umbrella shipped. All 5 phases executed successfully. Cluster B #1 (Platonic / geometric AI representations). First child in cluster B.
|
||||
|
||||
## Phase Results
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 1: Acquire
|
||||
|
||||
- **Transcript:** yt-dlp VTT recovered 3241 raw segments. Rolling-caption dedup (LCS algorithm) produced 1659 unique clean segments (61KB plain text).
|
||||
- **Video:** yt-dlp downloaded 89MB mp4 (format 400+251 merged via phase1_acquire driver).
|
||||
- **Note:** Phase 1 used the umbrella driver; clean transcript via rolling-caption LCS dedup from score_dynamics_giorgini improvements.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 2: Keyframes
|
||||
|
||||
ffmpeg scene detection at threshold 0.05. 133 raw frames extracted; imagehash phash dedup kept 62 unique frames. Higher count than score_dynamics (31) — this is a research talk with more slides.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 3: OCR
|
||||
|
||||
winsdk OCR processed 62 frames in 3.7 seconds (0.06s/frame). Output: 932 lines of markdown. Captures slide titles, bullet points, references.
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 4: Synthesis
|
||||
|
||||
Deep-dive report (1564 lines, 104KB) + summary (384 words). 10 appendices (concept map, transcript excerpts, formalizations, expanded connections, open questions, full bibliography, cross-references, synthesis summary, personal notes, glossary).
|
||||
|
||||
### Phase 5: Verification
|
||||
|
||||
All checks pass:
|
||||
- [x] All 7 deliverable artifacts present
|
||||
- [x] report.md is 1564 lines (within 1000-10000 target)
|
||||
- [x] summary.md is 384 words (within 200-400 target)
|
||||
- [x] All 8 report sections + 10 appendices populated, no TBDs
|
||||
- [x] Per-task commits with git notes
|
||||
- [x] video.mp4 + VTT properly gitignored
|
||||
|
||||
## Commits in this dispatch
|
||||
|
||||
| SHA | Message |
|
||||
|---|---|
|
||||
| `7fef95cc` | Phase 1: Acquire — 1659 clean segments (61KB) + 89MB mp4 |
|
||||
| `91fd5d65` | Phase 2: Keyframes — 62 unique frames from 133 raw (threshold 0.05) |
|
||||
| `25f8c612` | Phase 3: OCR — 62 frames OCR'd via winsdk in 3.7s |
|
||||
| `8bb7bc0b` | Phase 4: Synthesis — report.md (1564 lines, 104KB) + summary.md (384 words) |
|
||||
|
||||
## Key Findings
|
||||
|
||||
- **FER vs UFR** is the central distinction. FER (Fractured Entangled Representations) is what SGD finds; UFR (Unified Factored Representations) is what open-ended search finds. Picbreeder provides the canonical demonstration: same loss, same MLP architecture, completely different internal organization.
|
||||
- **Layerization** is the key technique — converting a CPPN (heterogeneous activations) to an MLP (uniform activations) for fair comparison. Picbreeder-CPPN → MLP has UFR; SGD-trained MLP has FER.
|
||||
- **FER predicts LLM jagged intelligence** — three independent recent papers support the FER diagnosis: GPT-3's chicken/duck counting failure, GPT-4's counterfactual-task degradation, Claude 3.5 Haiku's magnitude-heuristic arithmetic (per Anthropic circuit tracing).
|
||||
- **Open-endedness** has four properties: complexification, emergence, adaptability, serendipity. **Pressure to adapt** is the author's conjecture about the most important driver of UFR.
|
||||
- **The Platonic Representation Hypothesis** (Huh et al. 2024) is real but **statistical** — it doesn't address whether representations are factored. The author wants **structural** convergence (UFR), not just statistical.
|
||||
|
||||
## Next Steps
|
||||
|
||||
7 child tracks remaining:
|
||||
- free_lunches_levin (B #2 — now unblocked)
|
||||
- generic_systems_fields (C #1 — needs B done)
|
||||
- brain_counterintuitive (C #2 — needs B done)
|
||||
- neural_dynamics_miller (C #3 — needs B done)
|
||||
- multiscale_hoffman (C #4 — needs B done)
|
||||
- cs336_architectures (E — independent but R5 risk)
|
||||
- creikey_dl_cv (D — needs E done)
|
||||
|
||||
Plus 1 synthesis track after all children ship.
|
||||
|
||||
## Forward Connections Identified
|
||||
|
||||
This talk informs:
|
||||
- **cs336_architectures_20260621**: Predicts that scaling won't fix FER — same brittle mechanisms, more refined.
|
||||
- **creikey_dl_cv_20260621**: Methodological contrast — DDPM (SGD with score matching) vs Picbreeder (open-ended evolution).
|
||||
- **free_lunches_levin_20260621**: Open-endedness + algorithmic information.
|
||||
|
||||
## Backward Connections
|
||||
|
||||
This talk builds on:
|
||||
- **cs229_building_llms_20260621**: The SGD paradigm critiqued.
|
||||
- **probability_logic_20260621**: Probability foundations for "regularity."
|
||||
- **entropy_epiplexity_20260621**: Algorithmic information perspective — UFR is low-Kolmogorov-complexity representation; FER is high-complexity.
|
||||
- **score_dynamics_giorgini_20260621**: Alternative route to capturing regularities via score matching; potential connection — an MLP trained with score-matching loss might have UFR.
|
||||
|
||||
## Process notes
|
||||
|
||||
- Acknowledged user's reminder: mp4/vtt are gitignored, no need to delete.
|
||||
- Used umbrella driver (phase1_acquire.py) which required the LCS rolling-caption dedup added for child #4.
|
||||
- Higher frame count (62) reflects more slides; Phase 2 + Phase 3 took similar time to child #4 (lower threshold for math lecture).
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user