add new track

This commit is contained in:
2026-02-23 12:47:22 -05:00
parent ce75f0e5a1
commit a70e4e2b21
5 changed files with 58 additions and 0 deletions

View File

@@ -11,3 +11,8 @@ This file tracks all major tracks for the project. Each track has its own detail
- [ ] **Track: Review vendor api usage in regards to conservative context handling** - [ ] **Track: Review vendor api usage in regards to conservative context handling**
*Link: [./tracks/api_metrics_20260223/](./tracks/api_metrics_20260223/)* *Link: [./tracks/api_metrics_20260223/](./tracks/api_metrics_20260223/)*
---
- [ ] **Track: Update conductor to properly utilize the new api hooks for automated testing & verification of track implementation features withou the need of user intervention.**
*Link: [./tracks/api_hooks_verification_20260223/](./tracks/api_hooks_verification_20260223/)*

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
# Track api_hooks_verification_20260223 Context
- [Specification](./spec.md)
- [Implementation Plan](./plan.md)
- [Metadata](./metadata.json)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
{
"track_id": "api_hooks_verification_20260223",
"type": "feature",
"status": "new",
"created_at": "2026-02-23T17:46:51Z",
"updated_at": "2026-02-23T17:46:51Z",
"description": "Update conductor to properly utilize the new api hooks for automated testing & verification of track implementation features without the need of user intervention."
}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,19 @@
# Implementation Plan: Integrate API Hooks for Automated Track Verification
## Phase 1: Update Workflow Definition
- [ ] Task: Modify `conductor/workflow.md` to reflect the new automated verification process.
- [ ] Sub-task: Update the "Phase Completion Verification and Checkpointing Protocol" section to replace manual verification steps with a description of the automated API hook process.
- [ ] Sub-task: Ensure the updated workflow clearly states that the agent will announce the automated test, execute it, and then present the results (success or failure) to the user.
- [ ] Task: Conductor - User Manual Verification 'Phase 1: Update Workflow Definition' (Protocol in workflow.md)
## Phase 2: Implement Automated Verification Logic
- [ ] Task: Develop the client-side logic for communicating with the API hook server.
- [ ] Sub-task: Write failing unit tests for a new `ApiHookClient` that can send requests to the IPC server.
- [ ] Sub-task: Implement the `ApiHookClient` to make the tests pass.
- [ ] Task: Integrate the `ApiHookClient` into the Conductor agent's workflow.
- [ ] Sub-task: Write failing integration tests to ensure the Conductor's phase completion logic calls the `ApiHookClient`.
- [ ] Sub-task: Modify the workflow implementation to use the `ApiHookClient` for verification.
- [ ] Task: Implement result handling and user feedback.
- [ ] Sub-task: Write failing tests for handling success, failure, and server-unavailable scenarios.
- [ ] Sub-task: Implement the logic to log results, present them to the user, and halt the workflow on failure.
- [ ] Task: Conductor - User Manual Verification 'Phase 2: Implement Automated Verification Logic' (Protocol in workflow.md)

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,21 @@
# Specification: Integrate API Hooks for Automated Track Verification
## Overview
This track focuses on integrating the existing, previously implemented API hooks (from track `test_hooks_20260223`) into the Conductor workflow. The primary goal is to automate the verification steps within the "Phase Completion Verification and Checkpointing Protocol", reducing the need for manual user intervention and enabling a more streamlined, automated development process.
## Functional Requirements
- **Workflow Integration:** The `workflow.md` document, specifically the "Phase Completion Verification and Checkpointing Protocol," must be updated to replace manual verification steps with automated checks using the API hooks.
- **IPC Communication:** The updated workflow will communicate with the application's backend via the established IPC server to trigger verification tasks.
- **Result Handling:**
- All results from the API hook verifications must be logged for auditing and debugging purposes.
- Upon successful verification, the Conductor agent will proceed with the workflow as it currently does after a successful manual check.
- Upon failure, the agent will halt, present the failure logs to the user, and await further instructions.
- **User Interaction Model:** The system will transition from asking the user to perform a manual test to informing the user that an automated test is running, and then presenting the results.
## Non-Functional Requirements
- **Resilience:** The Conductor agent must handle cases where the API hook server is unavailable or a hook call fails unexpectedly, without crashing or entering an unrecoverable state.
- **Transparency:** All interactions with the API hooks must be clearly logged, making the automated process easy to monitor and debug.
## Out of Scope
- **Modifying API Hooks:** This track will not alter the existing API hooks, the IPC server, or the backend implementation. The focus is solely on the client-side integration within the Conductor agent's workflow.
- **Changes to Manual Overrides:** Users will retain the ability to manually intervene or bypass automated checks if necessary.