Private
Public Access
refactor(directives): strip metadata header from v1.md (9-17 of 51; meta extracted to meta.md)
This commit is contained in:
@@ -0,0 +1,10 @@
|
||||
# batch_verification_not_isolation
|
||||
|
||||
## v1
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this iteration:** Lifted verbatim from `conductor/workflow.md` §"Isolated-Pass Verification Fallacy (Added 2026-06-09)" (lines 510-514). This is the baseline encoding — the rationale-then-rule style currently in production.
|
||||
Future variants will test alternative encodings (rule-only, before/after) against this baseline.
|
||||
**Source:** `conductor/workflow.md:510-514`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
**Lifted:** 2026-07-02 (Phase 1 harvest by Tier 3 worker; user directive 2026-07-02 moved the header into this meta file)
|
||||
@@ -1,12 +1,3 @@
|
||||
# batch_verification_not_isolation — v1
|
||||
|
||||
**Why this iteration:** Lifted verbatim from `conductor/workflow.md` §"Isolated-Pass Verification Fallacy (Added 2026-06-09)" (lines 510-514). This is the baseline encoding — the rationale-then-rule style currently in production.
|
||||
Future variants will test alternative encodings (rule-only, before/after) against this baseline.
|
||||
|
||||
**Source:** `conductor/workflow.md:510-514`
|
||||
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
### Isolated-Pass Verification Fallacy (Added 2026-06-09)
|
||||
|
||||
A test that "passes when run after test X but fails in isolation" is a **fragile test, not a fragile fixture**. The flip side is also true: a test that "passes in isolation but fails in batch" is failing — its failure is masked by isolation. The only verification that matters for `live_gui` tests (or any test that depends on shared subprocess state) is the **batch run** in the suite the test will ship in.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user