All free from tag identifiers will be prefixed with `gen_` or `GEN_` as the namespace. This can either be changed after generation with a `.refactor` script (or your preferred subst method), OR by modifying [c_library.refactor](./c_library.refactor).
**If c_library.refactor is modified you may need to modify c_library.cpp and its [components](./components/). As some of the container generation relies on that prefix.**
These are functionally (and interface wise) equivalent to the library's `Array<Type>``HashTable<Type>` within [containers.hpp](../base/dependencies/containers.hpp)
Both files follow the same patter of providing three procedures:
*`gen_<container>_base` : Intended to be called once, defines universal "base" definitions.
*`gen_<container>` : Called per instatiation of the container for a given set of dependent args.
*`gen_<container>_generic_selection_interface` : Intended to be called once after all of the instantiated containers have finished generating. It will generate a set of generic selection macros as described by Macro Usage section below.
A simple `<container>_DefinitionCounter` is used to know how many instantiations of the template have occured. This is used to determine how to define `GENERIC_SLOT_<ID>_<functionID>` for the generic interface along with how many slots the `_Generic` macro will need to have generated.
*(I will be explaining this thing for the rest of this seciton along with gencpp c library's usage of it)*
The `_Generic` macro plays a key role in reducing direct need of the user to wrangle with mangled definition identifiers of 'templated' containers or for type coercion to map distinct data types to a common code path.
Because of its lack of use in many C11 libraries.. and, of those that do; they usually end up obfuscating it with excessive preprocessor abuse; Effort was put into minimizing how much of these macros are handled by the preprocessor vs gencpp itself.
The first `arg` of _Generic behaves as the "controlling expression" or the expression that resolves to a type which will dictate which of the following expressions provided after to `_Generic` will be resolved as the one used inline for the implemenation.
In this case, we directly added `(selecting_exp)` to the end there.. as we want to directly have the macro resolve to calling a resolved procedure. A default has been set to a struct as that leads to a neat compiler message that would otherwise be impossible beause static_assert is a statement and thus cannot be used within a slot.
Now, even with gencpp generating this type-expression table, we still need wrapper macros to achieve function 'overloading' for the templated containers as _Generic has a [significant drawback](https://www.chiark.greenend.org.uk/~sgtatham/quasiblog/c11-generic/):
> Discarded expressions still have to be semantically valid.
The only way to absolve this issue [(without resorting to nasty preprocessor hacks)](https://github.com/JacksonAllan/CC/blob/main/articles/Better_C_Generics_Part_1_The_Extendible_Generic.md) is with wrapping expressions in 'slot' resolving macros that do not expand if the slot is not defined:
`GENERIC_SLOT_1__function_sig` is our warpper of a "`int, func_use_int`" pair. The `GEN_IF_MACRO_DEFINED_INCLUDE_THIS_SLOT` is a verbse named macro to indicate that that pair will be expanded ***ONLY IF*** its defined.
To see the the actual macro definitions used - see: [generic_macros.h](./components/generic_macros.h). They'll be injected right after the usual macros in the generated header file.