correction
This commit is contained in:
1 parent
471e1980b5
commit
f5ef4331dc
4 files changed
+3
-35
No files matched your search
+1
-1
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ author: "Robert Clausecker"
|
||||
handle: FUZxxl
|
||||
post_id: "2060885487858880689"
|
||||
date: 2026-05-31
|
||||
archived: 2026-08-23
|
||||
archived: 2026-08-25
|
||||
draft: true
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- archive
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ author: "NOTimothyLottes"
|
||||
handle: NOTimothyLottes
|
||||
post_id: "2060730425929080874"
|
||||
date: 2026-05-30
|
||||
archived: 2026-08-23
|
||||
archived: 2026-08-25
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- archive
|
||||
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@ in_reply_to: ""
|
||||
Renovating CPU clock code. I'm assuming x86-64 TSC is always >= 1 GHz so that conversion of clock counter diff to nanoseconds is simply a MUL instruction fetching the RDX high 64-bit result (of the 128-bit computed). But figuring out how to do the inline asm was a pain.
|
||||
|
||||

|
||||
|
||||
Branches: [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-05-30-renovating-cpu-clock-code/2026-05-31-FUZxxl-if-you-do-the-multiply-in-uint128-t-and-then]]
|
||||
|
||||
**2/**
|
||||
|
||||
-32
@@ -1,32 +0,0 @@
|
||||
---
|
||||
title: "@retrotink2 That plus an oscilloscope … this is the way"
|
||||
type: archive
|
||||
source: twitter
|
||||
source_url: "https://x.com/NOTimothyLottes/status/2061252886453944549"
|
||||
author: "NOTimothyLottes"
|
||||
handle: NOTimothyLottes
|
||||
post_id: "2061252886453944549"
|
||||
date: 2026-06-01
|
||||
archived: 2026-08-23
|
||||
draft: false
|
||||
tags:
|
||||
- archive
|
||||
- twitter
|
||||
- NOTimothyLottes
|
||||
description: "@retrotink2 That plus an oscilloscope … this is the way"
|
||||
in_reply_to: "2061206435942511008"
|
||||
---
|
||||
|
||||
## Source
|
||||
|
||||
- URL: https://x.com/NOTimothyLottes/status/2061252886453944549
|
||||
- Author: NOTimothyLottes (@NOTimothyLottes)
|
||||
- Posted: 2026-06-01 01:05:59
|
||||
|
||||
> @NOTimothyLottes Here I am still debugging by looking at if a single LED turns on.
|
||||
|
||||
## Thread
|
||||
|
||||
**1/**
|
||||
|
||||
@retrotink2 That plus an oscilloscope … this is the way
|
||||
@@ -63,7 +63,6 @@ tags:
|
||||
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-05-29-took-perhaps-a-5-month-vacation-from-at-home]]
|
||||
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-05-30-renovating-cpu-clock-code]]
|
||||
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-05-31-no-debugger-debug-console-printf-style-prior]]
|
||||
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-06-01-that-plus-an-oscilloscope-this-is-the-way]]
|
||||
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-06-01-windows-thread-priority]]
|
||||
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-06-02-for-windows-trying-to-standardize-on-highest]]
|
||||
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-06-02-its-unfortunate-there-isnt-an-easy-way-to-map-the]]
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in new issue
Block a user