2078347557474849137

This commit is contained in:
ed committed 2026-08-25 11:59:57 -04:00
1 parent 9490004d3f
commit 5d4e2957c3
4 files changed
+49 -36

No files matched your search

@@ -7,7 +7,7 @@ author: "Boris Chuprin"
handle: noop_dev
post_id: "2078359568636080568"
date: 2026-07-18
archived: 2026-08-23
archived: 2026-08-25
draft: true
tags:
- archive
@@ -32,4 +32,4 @@ parent_post_id: "2078349730204078527"
## Related
- Spine: [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-18-i-realized-at-some-point-i-can-have-most]]
- Spine: [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-18-all-0-6-argument-syscall-options-in-32-bytes]]
@@ -0,0 +1,46 @@
---
title: "All {0-6} argument syscall options in 32-bytes."
type: archive
source: twitter
source_url: "https://x.com/NOTimothyLottes/status/2078347557474849137"
author: "NOTimothyLottes"
handle: NOTimothyLottes
post_id: "2078347557474849137"
date: 2026-07-18
archived: 2026-08-25
draft: false
tags:
- archive
- twitter
- NOTimothyLottes
description: "All {0-6} argument syscall options in 32-bytes."
in_reply_to: ""
---
## Source
- URL: https://x.com/NOTimothyLottes/status/2078347557474849137
- Author: NOTimothyLottes (@NOTimothyLottes)
- Posted: 2026-07-18 05:14:06
## Thread
**1/**
All {0-6} argument syscall options in 32-bytes. The plan is to embed the interpreter inside the words with a 3-byte overhead {AD (lodsd), FF E0 (jmp rax)} so levering lots of x86-64 stuff for minimal size
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HNfFmXoXkAAMHM9?format=png&name=orig)
**2/**
Everything forced in lower 32-bit, but still building around 64-bit support. Since I'm not using x86-64 CALL/RET I can free up the stack ops strictly for the data stack.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HNfGRZvXEAEtaKH?format=png&name=orig)
**3/**
I realized at some point I can have most interpreted forth-style words in an aligned 8-bytes. So can make a very small interpreter.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HNfHl-dXcAAf6Om?format=png&name=orig)
Branches: [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-18-all-0-6-argument-syscall-options-in-32-bytes/2026-07-18-noop_dev-even-smaller-code-size-possible-with-custom]]
@@ -1,33 +0,0 @@
---
title: "I realized at some point I can have most interpreted forth-style words in an aligned 8-bytes."
type: archive
source: twitter
source_url: "https://x.com/NOTimothyLottes/status/2078349730204078527"
author: "NOTimothyLottes"
handle: NOTimothyLottes
post_id: "2078349730204078527"
date: 2026-07-18
archived: 2026-08-23
draft: false
tags:
- archive
- twitter
- NOTimothyLottes
description: "I realized at some point I can have most interpreted forth-style words in an aligned 8-bytes."
in_reply_to: ""
---
## Source
- URL: https://x.com/NOTimothyLottes/status/2078349730204078527
- Author: NOTimothyLottes (@NOTimothyLottes)
- Posted: 2026-07-18 05:22:44
## Thread
**1/**
I realized at some point I can have most interpreted forth-style words in an aligned 8-bytes. So can make a very small interpreter.
![](https://pbs.twimg.com/media/HNfHl-dXcAAf6Om?format=png&name=orig)
Branches: [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-18-i-realized-at-some-point-i-can-have-most/2026-07-18-noop_dev-even-smaller-code-size-possible-with-custom]]
+1 -1
View File
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@ tags:
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-14-another-round-of-getting-optimized-error-checking]]
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-15-one-advantage-of-sar-aka-signed-is-that-the-shift]]
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-17-oh-f-it-the-urge-to-drop-the-c-baggage-was-too]]
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-18-i-realized-at-some-point-i-can-have-most]]
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-18-all-0-6-argument-syscall-options-in-32-bytes]]
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-19-the-aim-of-course-keep-the-stuff-that-doesnt-need]]
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-07-22-working-through-rough-draft-of-assembly-for-a]]
- [[archive/threads/NOTimothyLottes/2026-08-02-re-fpga-land-alus-im-firmly-distracted-by-an]]