# Live-GUI State Sync — Design **Date:** 2026-06-05 **Status:** Draft **Track:** live_gui_state_sync_20260605 (sub-project of v2) ## Problem Statement `App` (`src/gui_2.py`) and `AppController` (`src/app_controller.py`) maintain **parallel state** for the same logical fields. `set_value` writes to the **Controller**, but several code paths read from the **App**, returning stale or wrong values. ### Concrete failures (from 2026-06-05 batched test run, batches 7, 46, 65, 68) 1. **`test_auto_switch_sim::test_auto_switch_sim`** — sets `ui_separate_tier1=True` and `show_windows['Diagnostics']=True`, saves `Tier3Profile`, sets to False, triggers tier-3 auto-switch. Expects `show_windows['Diagnostics']=True` restored. **Fails: profile captures from App but is set on Controller.** 2. **`test_workspace_profiles_restoration::test_workspace_profiles_restoration`** — sets `ui_separate_tier1=True`, saves `test_restore`, sets to False, loads. Expects True. **Fails: same root cause.** 3. **`test_undo_redo_lifecycle::test_undo_redo_lifecycle`** (NEW regression) — sets `ai_input="Initial Input"`, modifies to `"Modified Input"`, clicks `btn_undo`. Expects `ai_input="Initial Input"`. **Fails: snapshot reads `app.ui_ai_input` but `set_value` writes to `controller.ui_ai_input`.** ### Audit of duplicated fields Static analysis of the 71 settable fields in `AppController._settable_fields` vs the 12 `panel_states` keys captured in `App._capture_workspace_profile`, plus the `show_windows` dict and snapshot fields: | Field | In `_settable_fields` (Controller)? | Read by App code? | Sync bug? | |---|---|---|---| | `show_windows` | yes | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 627), `_apply_workspace_profile` (line 633) | **YES** | | `ui_separate_task_dag` | yes | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 615) | **YES** | | `ui_separate_usage_analytics` | yes | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 616) | **YES** | | `ui_separate_tier1` | yes | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 617) | **YES** | | `ui_separate_tier2` | yes | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 618) | **YES** | | `ui_separate_tier3` | yes | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 619) | **YES** | | `ui_separate_tier4` | yes | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 620) | **YES** | | `ui_ai_input` | yes (`ai_input -> ui_ai_input`) | `_take_snapshot` (line 551), `_apply_snapshot` (line 569) | **YES** | | `ui_separate_context_preview` | no (NOT in settable_fields) | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 611) | no — App-only | | `ui_separate_message_panel` | no | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 612) | no — App-only | | `ui_separate_response_panel` | no | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 613) | no — App-only | | `ui_separate_tool_calls_panel` | no | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 614) | no — App-only | | `ui_separate_external_tools` | no | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 621) | no — App-only | | `ui_discussion_split_h` | no | `_capture_workspace_profile` (line 622) | no — App-only | **8 confirmed sync bugs.** Plus `ui_ai_input` (snapshot) is a 9th. ## Root Cause `App.__init__` creates a separate `AppController` instance and later sets `self.controller._app = self` (bidirectional link). The two objects each declare their own `self.ui_separate_tier1 = False` (App) and `self.ui_separate_tier1 = False` (Controller) in their respective `__init__`s. They are independent Python attributes. `set_value` (`src/api_hooks.py`, line 614) calls `setattr(controller, attr_name, value)` — writes to Controller. But `_capture_workspace_profile` reads `self.ui_separate_tier1` where `self` is the App — never updated. ## Design ### Goal Eliminate the dual state. **Single source of truth: the Controller.** The App becomes a thin "view" layer that exposes Controller fields as Python properties. `set_value` continues to write to the Controller. All reads (from save, snapshot, render) transparently read from the Controller. ### Approach: Properties on App that delegate to Controller Add `@property` definitions on the `App` class for each field that has a Controller counterpart. The getter returns `self.controller.X`. The setter (where App code writes, e.g. snapshot restore) also delegates to `self.controller.X`. **Hypothetical example for `ui_separate_tier1`:** ```python # In App class (src/gui_2.py) @property def ui_separate_tier1(self) -> bool: return self.controller.ui_separate_tier1 @ui_separate_tier1.setter def ui_separate_tier1(self, value: bool) -> None: self.controller.ui_separate_tier1 = value ``` This makes `app.ui_separate_tier1` and `controller.ui_separate_tier1` the same value, regardless of which path writes. The only writes are via the property setter (or `set_value` via the Controller directly), and all reads go through the getter. ### Why this approach - **Minimal blast radius**: The App class only adds properties; no method bodies change. Methods that read `self.X` continue to work — they just get the Controller's value via the property. - **Bidirectional**: Setter support is critical for `_apply_snapshot` and `_apply_workspace_profile` which set App fields directly (`self.ui_ai_input = snapshot.ai_input`). They go through the property setter, which writes to the Controller. - **No double-write footgun**: A "sync on set_value" alternative requires remembering to write to BOTH objects. A property approach is a single point of truth. - **Easy to migrate incrementally**: Each field is one property pair. Can be added one at a time with a regression test for each. ### Alternatives considered - **A2: Merge App and Controller into one class.** Rejected: would be a 5532-line → 4000-line merge with high risk. The Controller already lives in a separate file; the App delegates to it via `self.controller.X`. Merging would lose the existing boundary. - **A3: Sync on every set_value (write to both).** Rejected: requires touching every writer; easy to miss a site. Property approach is one place per field. - **A4: Pass Controller as a method argument everywhere.** Rejected: invasive; requires changing method signatures throughout `gui_2.py` and `app_controller.py`. ## File Changes ### Modify: `src/gui_2.py` (App class) Add `@property` + `@X.setter` for each of the 8 sync-bug fields, plus `ui_ai_input`: ```python @property def ui_separate_tier1(self) -> bool: return self.controller.ui_separate_tier1 @ui_separate_tier1.setter def ui_separate_tier1(self, value: bool) -> None: self.controller.ui_separate_tier1 = value ``` Fields to add properties for: - `ui_ai_input` (snapshot bug) - `ui_separate_task_dag` - `ui_separate_usage_analytics` - `ui_separate_tier1` through `ui_separate_tier4` - `show_windows` (special: dict, not bool) For `show_windows`, the property needs care — `set_value` may pass a new dict; the property should do `self.controller.show_windows = value` to allow full replacement, but for in-place updates (`self.show_windows["X"] = True`), the property getter returns the Controller's dict reference (so in-place mutations work) and the property setter can either replace or do nothing (since the dict is shared). ```python @property def show_windows(self) -> Dict[str, bool]: return self.controller.show_windows @show_windows.setter def show_windows(self, value: Dict[str, bool]) -> None: self.controller.show_windows = value ``` **Do NOT** add properties for fields that are App-only (no Controller counterpart): `ui_separate_context_preview`, `ui_separate_message_panel`, `ui_separate_response_panel`, `ui_separate_tool_calls_panel`, `ui_separate_external_tools`, `ui_discussion_split_h`, etc. — they remain as plain App attributes. ### Add: `tests/test_app_controller_state_sync.py` (new) A new unit test that encodes the contract: **for every field in `_settable_fields` that is also referenced as `self.X` in the App class's `_capture_workspace_profile` and `_take_snapshot`/`_apply_snapshot`, writes to `app.X` and `controller.X` must be observed by both.** ```python def test_ui_separate_tier1_setter_delegates_to_controller(): """The App's ui_separate_tier1 property is a delegate to the Controller. Writes through app.ui_separate_tier1 = X are visible at controller.ui_separate_tier1, and writes through set_value (which goes to controller) are visible at app.ui_separate_tier1.""" from src import app_controller, gui_2 from src.app_controller import AppController # Don't fully init App (too heavy); use lightweight setup app = gui_2.App.__new__(gui_2.App) app.controller = AppController() app._app = app # back-ref # set_value goes to controller app.controller.ui_separate_tier1 = True assert app.ui_separate_tier1 is True # reads through property # direct set through app's property app.ui_separate_tier1 = False assert app.controller.ui_separate_tier1 is False # write visible at controller ``` This is a regression test for the contract. ### Test impact After the fix, these tests should pass: - `test_auto_switch_sim::test_auto_switch_sim` (writes to `app.show_windows` and `app.ui_separate_tier1` are observed by save) - `test_workspace_profiles_sim::test_workspace_profiles_restoration` (same) - `test_undo_redo_lifecycle::test_undo_redo_lifecycle` (snapshot reads from `app.ui_ai_input` get the Controller's value) If `test_undo_redo_lifecycle` is **also** a flake or a regression from the user's recent cleanup commit `873edf42`, the property fix may not be sufficient. In that case, the test will continue to fail and need its own investigation track. ## Risk Assessment | Risk | Likelihood | Impact | Mitigation | |---|---|---|---| | Existing App code does `del app.ui_X` to reset state | Low | Low | property setter can be a no-op for `del` (raises AttributeError); review call sites | | App class is 5532 lines — risk of regression | High | Medium | Per-field property addition; one regression test per field; ship in a single atomic commit | | User's recent cleanup commit `873edf42` may have added or removed attribute references | Medium | Low | Run targeted regression test after each property addition | | New properties shadow existing class attributes | Low | High | Use `dir(app)` to verify no shadow before commit | ## Out of Scope - **prior_session test mock setup** — separate track (`prior_session_test_harden_20260605`). - **wait-for-ready test pattern** — separate track (`wait_for_ready_test_pattern_20260605`). - **Other App/Controller sync bugs not in the 8 listed** — audit will continue; if more found, queue as v3 sub-track. - **Refactoring App and Controller into one class** — deferred; property approach is sufficient for now.