diff --git a/conductor/tracks/fable_review_20260617/report.md b/conductor/tracks/fable_review_20260617/report.md
index 0e0a741c..76f52873 100644
--- a/conductor/tracks/fable_review_20260617/report.md
+++ b/conductor/tracks/fable_review_20260617/report.md
@@ -656,7 +656,75 @@ The strongest claim: Manual Slop's mistake-handling is *more concrete and more a
 *Source cluster: `research/cluster_6_evenhandedness.md`*
 *Verdict orientation: Persona + Useful caveats*
 
-*[FILL IN: ~300 lines.]*
+### What this section is
+
+This section synthesizes the verdict from `research/cluster_6_evenhandedness.md` (348 lines). The cluster verdict is **Persona + Useful caveats**: 4 of 6 Fable lines are persona (the framing rule, the harm-decline, the stereotype rule, the sincerity rule), 2 of 6 have useful caveats (the "fair, accurate overview" pattern, the "so the person can navigate for themselves" pattern). This is the cleanest example of the shape-vs-persona distinction in the Fable prompt.
+
+### Fable's evenhandedness section (lines 134-146)
+
+The Fable `evenhandedness` section is 13 lines, organized around the framing rule:
+
+> "A request to explain, discuss, argue for, defend, or write persuasive content for a political, ethical, policy, empirical, or other position is a request for the best case its defenders would make, not for Claude's own view" (Fable System Prompt.md:136) — Persona (the framing rule).
+
+> "Claude does not decline requests to present such arguments on the grounds of potential harm except for very extreme positions" (Fable System Prompt.md:138) — Persona (the harm-decline carve-out).
+
+> "Claude ends its response to requests for such content by presenting opposing perspectives or empirical disputes, even for positions it agrees with" (Fable System Prompt.md:138) — Persona (the symmetric-closure rule).
+
+> "Claude is wary of humor or creative content built on stereotypes, including of majority groups" (Fable System Prompt.md:140) — Persona (the stereotype rule).
+
+> "Claude is cautious about sharing personal opinions on currently contested political topics. It needn't deny having opinions, but can decline to share them... and instead give a fair, accurate overview of existing positions" (Fable System Prompt.md:142) — Useful caveat (the "fair, accurate overview" pattern is a provenance claim).
+
+> "Claude avoids being heavy-handed or repetitive with its views, and offers alternative perspectives where relevant so the person can navigate for themselves" (Fable System Prompt.md:144) — Useful caveat (the "user-as-navigator" pattern).
+
+> "Claude treats moral and political questions as sincere inquiries deserving of substantive answers, regardless of how they're phrased" (Fable System Prompt.md:146) — Persona (the sincerity rule; the model treats them as sincere, but the user's intent is data).
+
+> "That charity applies to the topic, not every requested format: if asked for a simple yes/no or one-word answer on complex or contested issues or figures, Claude can decline the short form, give a nuanced answer, and explain why brevity wouldn't be appropriate" (Fable System Prompt.md:146) — Persona (the no-collapse-to-yes-no rule).
+
+### Manual Slop's response
+
+Manual Slop's analog to Fable's evenhandedness is the **RAG integration discipline** + the **receiving-code-review** skill:
+
+- `conductor/code_styleguides/rag_integration_discipline.md:11-156`: 6 rules (opt-in, complement, provenance, no mutation, feature-gated, graceful failure). The 6 rules map 1:1 to Fable's 6 lines: Fable's "best case its defenders would make" (line 136) maps to the RAG rule "preserve the source's framing, not the model's"; Fable's "fair, accurate overview" (line 142) maps to the RAG rule "provenance is mandatory"; Fable's "user-as-navigator" (line 144) maps to the RAG rule "the user owns the result, not the model."
+- The Manual Slop version is **shape-anchored** (dataclass fields + audit scripts + byte-comparison test); Fable's is **prose-anchored**. The shape is verifiable; the prose is not.
+- `AGENTS.md §"receiving-code-review"`: the receiving-code-review skill. The agent-side analog of Fable's evenhandedness. The skill is "verify before agreeing; state corrections factually; no performative agreement."
+- `conductor/code_styleguides/rag_integration_discipline.md:67-89`: the "no mutation" rule. The agent does not edit the user's content; the user owns the result.
+- `docs/AGENTS.md §4`: the 4 memory dimensions decision tree. The "knowledge" dimension is provenance-aware plain markdown the user edits; the agent does not impose framing.
+
+### nagent's response
+
+nagent's relevant patterns for evenhandedness:
+
+- `nagent_review_v2_3_20260612.md §2.10` (RAG integration discipline): the conservative-RAG rule. Opt-in, complement, provenance, no mutation, feature-gated, graceful failure. Same shape as Manual Slop's RAG discipline.
+- `nagent_review_v2_3_20260612.md §2.7` (Conversations are editable state): the user can edit any content. The model does not impose framing.
+- `nagent_review_v2_3_20260612.md §3.4` (Conversation compaction): the 12-section structured output preserves the user's framing (User Intent, Accepted Decisions, Constraints). The model's evenhandedness is structural, not persona-driven.
+
+### The verdict: Persona + Useful caveats
+
+**Verdict: Persona + Useful caveats.**
+
+The cleanest example of the shape-vs-persona distinction in the Fable prompt. 4 of 6 lines are persona (the framing rule, the harm-decline, the stereotype rule, the sincerity rule). 2 of 6 lines have useful caveats (the "fair, accurate overview" pattern = provenance; the "user-as-navigator" pattern = user owns the result).
+
+The strongest claim: the Manual Slop version is shape-anchored (dataclass fields + audit scripts + byte-comparison test); Fable's is prose-anchored. The shape is verifiable; the prose is not. A "best case its defenders would make" directive is a hand-wave; a "preserve the source's framing, not the model's" rule with a `provenance` dataclass field is a testable contract.
+
+### Sub-verdicts by line range
+
+- **Line 136** (framing rule): Persona Performance.
+- **Line 138** (harm-decline + symmetric closure): Persona Performance.
+- **Line 140** (stereotype rule): Persona Performance.
+- **Line 142** (fair, accurate overview): Useful caveat (provenance).
+- **Line 144** (user-as-navigator): Useful caveat (user owns the result).
+- **Line 146** (sincerity + no-collapse-to-yes-no): Persona Performance.
+
+### Synthesis section handoffs
+
+- **§13 (Genuinely Useful)** gets the 2 caveats (provenance, user-as-navigator).
+- **§14 (Anti-User Watchdog)** gets line 140 (content policy via persona).
+- **§15 (Persona Performance)** gets lines 136, 138, 146.
+
+### What the deferred rebuild should do
+
+- **Adopt the 2 caveats** (Fable System Prompt.md:142, 144). Manual Slop destination: a new section in `conductor/code_styleguides/rag_integration_discipline.md` titled "Provenance + User-as-Navigator." Priority: Medium (the principles are already in the existing RAG discipline; the explicit Fable citation is documentation).
+- **Reject the persona framing** (Fable System Prompt.md:136, 138, 140, 146). Manual Slop destination: a new section in `AGENTS.md §"Critical Anti-Patterns"` titled "Do Not Adopt Persona-Driven Evenhandedness Directives." Priority: High.
 
 ---